The Bottom Line
What is behind Trump’s call to turn NATO into ‘NATO plus ME’?
The US president asked NATO to become ‘much more involved in the Middle East’. So what’s next for the military alliance?
After the assassination of Iranian General Qassem Soleimani in early January, US President Donald Trump said that a string of accomplishments had “changed our strategic priorities,” paving the way for US forces in the region to withdraw.
“We can come home, or largely come home, and use NATO,” he said, describing the Middle East as “a big source of problems.”
Recommended Stories
list of 4 items- list 1 of 4US agencies unite to combat rogue drone threats nationwide
- list 2 of 4Kremlin says European countries not included in next Ukraine talks
- list 3 of 4Romania says Russia-run sabotage network set fire near weapons factory
- list 4 of 4Romania blames Russia after drone sinks ship in the Black Sea
Washington, as the biggest player in NATO, can sway the mission of the alliance. NATO’s mandate has evolved over the past 70 years from confronting the USSR to fighting alongside the United States in Afghanistan and Iraq.
So, what is next for NATO? Will Trump be able to impose his will on the other 28 members? What would NATO’s engagement in the Middle East look like? And what would Washington’s disengagement with the region look like?
Join Steve Clemons as we get to The Bottom Line.
Guests:
Alexander Vershbow – Former deputy secretary-general of NATO and US ambassador to the Alliance; currently at the Atlantic Council.
Heather Conley – Former US State Department official working on Europe; currently, director of the Europe Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies
Nile Gardiner – Foreign policy analyst at the Heritage Foundation and former aide to Lady Margaret Thatcher