[QODLink]
Americas
US stubs out graphic cigarette warning labels
Federal court upholds decision that government's proposed health warnings on cigarettes verged on anti-smoking advocacy.
Last Modified: 25 Aug 2012 10:56
According to US government, smoking is responsible for about 443,000 deaths in the country every year [Reuters]

An appeals court has upheld a decision barring the US government from requiring tobacco companies to put large graphic health warnings on cigarette packages to show that smoking can disfigure and even kill.

The US Court of Appeals in Washington on Friday affirmed a lower court ruling that the requirement ran afoul of the US Constitution's free speech protections.

Some of the nation's largest tobacco companies sued to block the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) mandate to include warnings to show the dangers of smoking.

They argued that the proposed warnings went beyond factual information into anti-smoking advocacy.

The government argued the photos of dead and diseased smokers are factual in conveying the dangers of tobacco, which is responsible for about 443,000 deaths in the US a year.

Advertising options

The nine graphic warnings proposed by the FDA include color images of a man exhaling cigarette smoke through a tracheotomy hole in his throat, and a plume of cigarette smoke enveloping an infant receiving a mother's kiss.

These are accompanied by language that says smoking causes cancer and can harm fetuses. The warnings were to cover the entire top half of cigarette packs, front and back.

In recent years, more than 40 countries or jurisdictions have introduced labels similar to those created by the FDA.

The World Health Organization said in a survey done in countries with graphic labels that a majority of smokers noticed the warnings and more than 25 per cent said the warnings led them to consider quitting.

Tobacco companies increasingly rely on their packaging to build brand loyalty and grab consumers, one of the few advertising levers left to them after the government curbed their presence in magazines, billboards and TV.

Free speech

"It's a significant vindication of First Amendment principles," Floyd Abrams, an attorney representing Lorillard Tobacco, said referring to the US Constitution's free speech guarantee.

"There's never been any doubt that the government could require warnings on products that can have dangerous results," Abrams said

"And what the court is saying is that there are real limits on the ability of the government to require the manufacturer of a lawful product to denounce the product in the course of trying to sell it."

The FDA declined to comment on pending litigation, and the Justice Department said it would review the appeals court ruling. Public health groups are urging the government to appeal.

397

Source:
Agencies
Topics in this article
People
Country
Organisation
Featured on Al Jazeera
At least 25 tax collectors have been killed since 2012 in Mogadishu, a city awash in weapons and abject poverty.
Tokyo government claims its homeless population has hit a record low, but analysts - and the homeless - beg to differ.
3D printers can cheaply construct homes and could soon be deployed to help victims of catastrophe rebuild their lives.
Lack of child protection laws means abandoned and orphaned kids rely heavily on the care of strangers.
Featured
Booming global trade in 50-million-year-old amber stones is lucrative, controversial, and extremely dangerous.
Legendary Native-American High Bird was trained in ancient warrior traditions, which he employed in World War II.
Hounded opposition figure says he's hoping for the best at sodomy appeal but prepared to return to prison.
Fears of rising Islamophobia and racial profiling after two soldiers killed in separate incidents.
Group's culture of summary justice is back in Northern Ireland's spotlight after new sexual assault accusations.