[QODLink]
Americas
US stubs out graphic cigarette warning labels
Federal court upholds decision that government's proposed health warnings on cigarettes verged on anti-smoking advocacy.
Last Modified: 25 Aug 2012 10:56
According to US government, smoking is responsible for about 443,000 deaths in the country every year [Reuters]

An appeals court has upheld a decision barring the US government from requiring tobacco companies to put large graphic health warnings on cigarette packages to show that smoking can disfigure and even kill.

The US Court of Appeals in Washington on Friday affirmed a lower court ruling that the requirement ran afoul of the US Constitution's free speech protections.

Some of the nation's largest tobacco companies sued to block the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) mandate to include warnings to show the dangers of smoking.

They argued that the proposed warnings went beyond factual information into anti-smoking advocacy.

The government argued the photos of dead and diseased smokers are factual in conveying the dangers of tobacco, which is responsible for about 443,000 deaths in the US a year.

Advertising options

The nine graphic warnings proposed by the FDA include color images of a man exhaling cigarette smoke through a tracheotomy hole in his throat, and a plume of cigarette smoke enveloping an infant receiving a mother's kiss.

These are accompanied by language that says smoking causes cancer and can harm fetuses. The warnings were to cover the entire top half of cigarette packs, front and back.

In recent years, more than 40 countries or jurisdictions have introduced labels similar to those created by the FDA.

The World Health Organization said in a survey done in countries with graphic labels that a majority of smokers noticed the warnings and more than 25 per cent said the warnings led them to consider quitting.

Tobacco companies increasingly rely on their packaging to build brand loyalty and grab consumers, one of the few advertising levers left to them after the government curbed their presence in magazines, billboards and TV.

Free speech

"It's a significant vindication of First Amendment principles," Floyd Abrams, an attorney representing Lorillard Tobacco, said referring to the US Constitution's free speech guarantee.

"There's never been any doubt that the government could require warnings on products that can have dangerous results," Abrams said

"And what the court is saying is that there are real limits on the ability of the government to require the manufacturer of a lawful product to denounce the product in the course of trying to sell it."

The FDA declined to comment on pending litigation, and the Justice Department said it would review the appeals court ruling. Public health groups are urging the government to appeal.

397

Source:
Agencies
Topics in this article
People
Country
Organisation
Featured on Al Jazeera
An innovative rehabilitation programme offers Danish fighters in Syria an escape route and help without prosecution.
Street tension between radical Muslims and Holland's hard right rises, as Islamic State anxiety grows.
Take an immersive look at the challenges facing the war-torn country as US troops begin their withdrawal.
Ministers and MPs caught on camera sleeping through important speeches have sparked criticism that they are not working.
Featured
Anti-government secrecy organisation struggling for relevance without Julian Assange at the helm.
After decades of overfishing, Japan is taking aim at increasing the number of bluefin tuna in the ocean.
Chinese scientists are designing a particle-smashing collider so massive it could encircle a city.
Critics say the government is going full-steam ahead on economic recovery at the expense of human rights.
Spirits are high in Scotland's 'Whisky Capital of the World' with one distillery thirsty for independence.
join our mailing list