Rabobank ends involvement in cycling

One of the longest-standing team sponsors in professional cycling to end backing in wake of USADA report.

Rabobank said the USADA report, which was published last week and put seven-time Tour de France winner Lance Armstrong at the heart of the doping scandal, was the ‘final straw’ [EPA]
Rabobank said the USADA report, which was published last week and put seven-time Tour de France winner Lance Armstrong at the heart of the doping scandal, was the ‘final straw’ [EPA]

Dutch lender Rabobank has ended its 17-year sponsorship of professional cycling, saying it had lost faith in the sport’s leaders to clean up following the Lance Armstrong doping scandal.

Rabobank is the biggest backer of Dutch professional cycling, with total sponsorship worth $20m a year in a nation with as many bikes as people.

Its decision shows the damage being done to cycling after the US Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) said seven times Tour de France winner Armstrong took part in and organised a sophisticated doping scheme on his way to success.

“We are no longer convinced that the international professional world of cycling can make this a clean and fair sport. We are not confident that this will change for the better in the foreseeable future,” Bert Bruggink, Rabobank board member, said in a statement.

‘Final straw’

“The USADA report was the final straw,” he added later in a press conference televised live in the Netherlands.

“The international sport of cycling is not only sick, the sickness goes up to the highest levels,” he said.

Sportswear company Nike and brewer Anheuser-Busch dropped their sponsorship of Armstrong this week, and the sport must show it can tackle doping effectively to prevent more of its backers from quitting.

The International Cycling Union (UCI), the sport’s governing body, has yet to rule on the USADA’s report into Armstrong and has been criticised for dragging its feet.

“Despite inevitable and sometimes painful consequences, the UCI reaffirms its commitment to the fight against doping and full transparency about potential anti-doping rule violations,” the Paris-based UCI said on Friday.

Armstrong, a 41-year-old cancer survivor, has always denied taking banned substances but has decided not to challenge the USADA charges.

American rider Levi Leipheimer, who rode for Rabobank between 2002 and 2004, was sacked this week by the Quick-Step Cycling Team after admitting to the USADA investigation that he took banned substances.

Leipheimer, 38, was one of 11 former team mates to testify against Armstrong.

Another sponsor, SKINS, which is a partner of the Rabobank team, said on Thursday it would reconsider its association with the sport if its UCI governing body failed to act on doping.

Its Chief Executive Jaimie Fuller warned the commercial fall-out could be worse than the damage suffered by a doping scandal centred on the Festina team that hit the Tour de France in 1998.

Lucrative market

Cycling has attracted a new generation of sponsors in recent years who stress their commitment to clean competition.

The sport increasingly appeals to affluent fortysomethings who want to stay active for longer – earning it the nickname “the new golf” and boosting its commercial appeal.

British team Sky, sponsored by pay-TV company BSkyB, said this week it would sack team members unless they signed a document saying they had never doped. Sky rider Bradley Wiggins this year became the first Briton to win the Tour.

The Rabobank cycling team, which has taken part in every single Tour de France since 1984, said in a statement it regretted but understood the bank’s decision.

“We’ve been cycling for 17 years now with the name Rabobank proudly on our shirts, and it hurts that going forward we’ll have to do without that name,” it said.

Its top riders are Dutchman Robert Gesink, this year’s Tour of California winner, and Spaniard Luis Leon Sanchez, winner of four Tour de France stages.

Some critics said Rabobank was using Armstrong as an excuse to cut spending on sports sponsorship.

“Fact that Rabobank decision includes the women’s team suggests that it’s a commercial decision not an ethical one. USADA provided excuse,” Irish former Olympic coach Dave Smith said on Twitter.

Source : Reuters

More from Sports
Most Read