UN to hear Serbia 'genocide' claim

Hague court will consider Croatia complaint of ethnic cleansing by Belgrade during 1990s.

    Serbia stands accused of ethnic cleansing committed during the regional conflict of the early 1990s [AFP]

    Croatia lodged a genocide complaint against Serbia at the ICJ in 1999, claiming it had committed "a form of genocide which resulted in large numbers of Croatian citizens being displaced, killed, tortured, or illegally detained as well as extensive property destruction".

    But Serbia argued before the court in May that it had no jurisdiction to hear the case over alleged crimes committed during the 1991-95 Croatian war that claimed about 20,000 lives.

    Belgrade contended that the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, the name by which the federated state was formerly known, had not been a member of the UN nor a party to its convention on the prevention of genocide on the date Croatia's complaint was filed.

    It also said that the majority of the crimes outlined in the complaint were committed before the formation of the current republic.

    Croatia's core complaint could not be heard before a decision had been made on Serbia's objection to the court's jurisdiction.

    Reparation claims

    Last year, the ICJ cleared Belgrade of genocide in Bosnia during the break-up of the former Yugoslav federation.

    It judged the 1995 massacre of thousands of men and boys at Srebrenica in Bosnia to have been an act of genocide, without attributing direct responsibility to Serbia.

    In its application, Croatia claimed that Serbia continued to violate the genocide convention by "failing to punish those responsible, by not revealing information on missing persons, and by not returning cultural property taken from Croatia during its occupation".

    On top of punishment for those responsible, Croatia is seeking reparations and an order for the recovery of cultural treasures it claims were pillaged during the war.

    The charges against Belgrade would have been strengthened in both cases by a judgment against Slobodan Milosevic, the former Serbian president, but he died in March 2006 before the conclusion of his war crimes trial.

    Ivan Simonovic, the leading Croatian lawyer on the case, said he was "very satisfied" with the court's judgment, which he expected to add to pressure on Serbia to speed up its processes of bringing war criminals to book, finding missing persons, and returning cultural treasures.

    "We are not launching these proceedings to live in the past but to build healthy foundations for the sustainable future of the region," he said.

    A hearing of the case should also bring to light information lost with Milosevic's death, said Simonovic.

    He expected the case to be heard in three years' time.

    SOURCE: Agencies


    YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

    How Moscow lost Riyadh in 1938

    How Moscow lost Riyadh in 1938

    Russian-Saudi relations could be very different today, if Stalin hadn't killed the Soviet ambassador to Saudi Arabia.

    Interactive: Coding like a girl

    Interactive: Coding like a girl

    What obstacles do young women in technology have to overcome to achieve their dreams? Play this retro game to find out.

    The War in October: What Happened in 1973?

    The War in October: What Happened in 1973?

    Al Jazeera examines three weeks of war from which both Arabs and Israelis claimed to emerge victorious.