Legal setback for S Africa's Zuma

Court rules documents seized by police can be used against senior ANC leader.

    Zuma says the corruption charges against him
    are a political conspiracy [AP] 

    Charges against Zuma of bribery and fraud, tied to his role in an arms deal, were thrown out in 2006 after a high court judge ruled documents obtained during raids on Zuma's home could not be used by prosecutors because the warrants used to obtain them were illegal.
     
    But in a majority decision, the appeals court has said the warrants had proper legal authority, clearing the way for the evidence to be used in any future corruption trial against Zuma.
     
    'Political consipiracy'
     
    Zuma is considered a candidate to lead the ruling African National Congress (ANC), due to elect a new leader next month.
     
    But Thabo Mbeki, the president, who fired Zuma in 2005, has hinted he will run for a third term as ANC leader despite opposition from some ANC members and leftist allies.
     
    The Zuma camp was quiet after the court ruling on Thursday, with the ANC releasing a brief statement, saying: "We respect the court's decision. As we have consistently maintained, the law must be allowed to take its course."
     
    Supporters of Zuma, who is currently the ANC party deputy president, have described the corruption investigation as a political conspiracy to prevent him from winning the ANC leadership and ultimately the presidency of the country.

    SOURCE: Agencies


    YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

    Learn what India's parties' symbols mean by drawing them

    Learn what India's parties' symbols mean by drawing them

    More than 2,300 political parties have registered for the largest electoral exercise in the world.

    Visualising every Saudi coalition air raid on Yemen

    Visualising every Saudi coalition air raid on Yemen

    Since March 2015, Saudi Arabia and a coalition of Arab states have launched more than 19,278 air raids across Yemen.

    Why did Bush go to war in Iraq?

    Why did Bush go to war in Iraq?

    No, it wasn't because of WMDs, democracy or Iraqi oil. The real reason is much more sinister than that.