Canada climate battle looms as Alberta takes aim at PM Trudeau

Canada will struggle to meet its ambitious climate target without significant greenhouse gas reductions from Alberta, the nation’s highest polluting province.

The conservative leader of Canada’s energy-rich Alberta province has put herself on a collision course with Prime Minister Justin Trudeau over climate policies that would weigh on its massive fossil fuel industry.

Danielle Smith, leader of the United Conservative Party (UCP), defeated left-leaning New Democratic Party leader Rachel Notley in an election on Monday and immediately targeted Trudeau, threatening the country’s ambitious climate goals.

Smith warned federal climate policies will destroy tens of thousands of jobs in the oil and gas sector, which contributes more than 20 percent to Alberta’s gross domestic product.

Trudeau’s government is aiming to cut climate-warming carbon emissions by 40-45 percent by 2030 but will struggle to meet that target without significant reductions from Alberta, Canada’s highest polluting province.

Some analysts say deep emissions cuts are not possible without reducing oil production, which Smith is fiercely opposed to.

In her victory speech in front of cheering supporters in Canada’s oil capital Calgary, Smith called on Albertans to stand up against policies including the federal government’s proposed oil and gas emissions cap and clean electricity regulations, expected to be unveiled within weeks.

“We need to come together no matter how we have voted to stand shoulder to shoulder against soon to be announced Ottawa policies that would significantly harm our provincial economy,” said Smith.

“Hopefully the prime minister and his caucus are watching tonight. As premier I cannot under any circumstances allow these contemplated federal policies to be inflicted upon Albertans.”

‘Heavily invested’

Canada has the world’s third largest oil reserves, most of which are held in northern Alberta’s vast oil sands. The province produces about 80 percent of Canada’s 4.9 million barrels per day of crude oil.

The federal government says Canada needs to cut emissions from oil and gas production to stay competitive as the world transitions to net zero by 2050.

“Alberta is obviously heavily invested in a future that involves the oil and gas economy,” said Darrell Bricker, CEO of pollster Ipsos Public Affairs. “This is going to be a bone of contention with Ottawa.”

Since becoming premier in October, Smith passed legislation allowing the province to refuse to enforce federal laws it deems unconstitutional, and she has threatened to use it on legislation seen as a potential threat to Alberta’s energy industry.

Smith and Trudeau have also sparred over who should pay for potential increases to tax credits for carbon capture and storage (CCS) projects that the oil and gas industry wants to use to decarbonise its production process.

“One of the challenges is there is a political class in Alberta that has decided that anything to do with climate change is going to be bad for them or for Alberta,” Trudeau said in a January interview.

However, some industry leaders seeking public sector funding for CCS are tiring of the combative relationship between the two levels of government and have called for better collaboration.

Earlier this year Alex Pourbaix, then-CEO of oil producer Cenovus Energy, said he would “like to see the temperature turned down a little bit”.

For Trudeau, Smith may be a better political counterpoint than her less controversial rival Notley would have been, Bricker said, as the Liberals can cast her as a western version of federal Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre.

That said, provincial leaders of all political stripes tend to work with the federal government when it is beneficial to their electorate, as has been the case recently with federal funding for healthcare and childcare.

“Danielle Smith is canny enough to know that she has to be able to work with Ottawa,” said Shachi Kurl, president of pollster Angus Reid Institute.

“There is a lot of bellicose rhetoric that comes from the western premiers sometimes … But at the end of the day, politically, it does none of them any good to not be able to work together.”

Source: Reuters