UK to resume Saudi arms exports despite Yemen war concerns

Campaigners against the arms trade slammed the ‘morally indefensible’ decision to resume weapon sales to the kingdom.

A worker reacts as he stands on the wreckage of a vehicle oil and tires store hit by Saudi-led air strikes in Sanaa, Yemen July 2, 2020. REUTERS/Khaled Abdullah
A civilian reacts as he stands on wreckage after a Saudi air raid in Yemen's capital Sanaa earlier this month [Khaled Abdullah/Reuters]

The United Kingdom will resume weapons sales to Saudi Arabia despite international concerns that some could be used in the war in Yemen.

International Trade Secretary Liz Truss told Parliament on Tuesday that a government assessment suggested, “There is not a clear risk that the export of arms and military equipment to Saudi Arabia might be used in the commission of a serious violation of [international humanitarian law]”.

Opposition legislators and campaigners against the arms trade slammed the “morally indefensible” decision by Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s Conservative government.

The move followed a court ruling last year that the UK’s licensing of arms sales to Saudi Arabia was unlawful, after campaigners argued the government had failed to make a proper assessment of humanitarian risks.


While the court’s decision did not mean the UK had to halt arms exports to Saudi Arabia, it did mean it had to pause the granting of new export licences to sell arms to the kingdom – the UK’s biggest weapons purchaser.

Truss said the government had “now re-taken the decisions that were the subject of judicial review on the correct legal basis, as required”.

“It follows that the undertaking [given] to the court -that we would not grant any new licences for the export of arms or military equipment to Saudi Arabia for possible use in Yemen – falls away,” she said in a written statement.

‘Morally bankrupt’

The legal action against the British government was brought by the Campaign Against the Arms Trade (CAAT), which wants to end the global arms trade and argued that British weapons were likely to have been used in Yemen in violation of human rights law.

Truss said the review found Saudi Arabia had “genuine intent and the capacity to comply with IHL (International Humanitarian Law)”.


“On that basis, I have assessed that there is not a clear risk that the export of arms and military equipment to Saudi Arabia might be used in the commission of a serious violation of IHL,” she said.

CAAT condemned the decision.

“This is a disgraceful and morally bankrupt decision. The Saudi-led bombardment of Yemen has created the world’s worst humanitarian crisis, and the government itself admits that UK-made arms have played a central role on the bombing,” said the group’s Andrew Smith of CAAT.

“We will be considering this new decision with our lawyers, and will be exploring all options available to challenge it.”

Source: News Agencies

More from News
Most Read