Voters in Burundi have backed constitutional amendments that coud potentially allow President Pierre Nkurunziza to stay in office until 2034 as well as boost his powers.
Pierre-Claver Ndayicariye, election commission chief, said 73 percent of voters had voted “Yes” in the referendum to change the constitution, including whether the current five-year-presidential terms will be increased to seven years. No change to the limit of two terms in office was proposed.
Nineteen percent voted “No”, with a turnout of 96 percent. More than five million people had registered to vote in the referendum on May 17, according to officials
The new document also scraps one of the country’s two constitutionally enshrined vice presidents and shift a number of powers away from the government to the president.
Before the vote, the opposition had decried it as an undemocratic foregone conclusion.
On Saturday, Agathon Rwasa, head of the Amizero y’Abarundi bloc and one of the few opposition leaders still in the country, alleged that government forces had arrested perceived opponents ahead of the ballot and threatened to assassinate those who voted against amending the constitution.
“We will not accept the outcome of this referendum because it is a fantasy,” he said.
In an interview with Al Jazeera before the announcement of the result, Rwasa said there was clear proof of rigging.
“In many polling stations many administratives could go in with some ballot papers which were either filled or to be filled,” Rwasa said.
“Many more had about 15 bags and even more. I just mentioned the case in the polling station where, according to the electoral vote, no polling bureau could go beyond 500 people.
“But [for] this one, they registered more than 600 votes. What does it mean if this is not a proof of rigging?” Rwasa asked.
Al Jazeera’s Catherine Soi, reporting from the capital, Bujumbura, said that Rwasa plans to file a petition in court within three days. The constitutional court has another eight days to listen to the petition and make a ruling.
Soi said than even Rwasa does not appear to be confident about getting justice through the court system, he still plans to file the petition “to make a statement and show that the opposition is unhappy with these results, that this was a sham and there were a lot of irregularities,” Soi said.
“The opposition are really upset, saying that this is really a way for the president to try to hang onto power,” she added.
Before the vote, human rights groups said the campaign period had been marked by intimidation and abuse.
The “full scale of abuse” is likely “significantly higher”, HRW said on Friday, with “many victims and witnesses unwilling or unable to report abuses”.
Ida Sawyer, HRW’s central Africa director, said the vote had taken place amid “widespread abuse, fear and pressure – a climate that is clearly not conducive to free choice”.
But Willy Nyamitwe, Nkurunziza’s presidential spokesman, praised the “peace” in which the ballot was held.
The referendum came three years after Nkurunziza won a controversial third term as president during a 2015 election, which was boycotted by the opposition.
Nkurunziza first came to power in 2005, five years after the signing of a nationwide peace deal known as the Arusha Accords, which paved the way for the ending of a 12-year-long civil war that saw more than 300,000 people killed.
According to a provision in the peace deal, no leader could serve more than two five-year terms.
But in early 2015, Nkurunziza claimed it was legal for him to run in the elections because for his first term he had been appointed to the presidency by parliament – as opposed to being voted in.
A political crisis ensued, with the opposition calling Nkurunziza’s bid unconstitutional. An attempted coup was quashed, while a crackdown on anti-government protests resulted in the killing of at least 1,200 people.
More than 400,000 others, including opposition leaders, fled the country.
As well as allowing Nkurunziza to prolong his rule, the approved changes to Burundi’s constitution also allow the revision of ethnic quotas currently protected under the accords.