Former US Fed chief Ben Bernanke shares Nobel for economics

The trio won for their research on how regulating banks and propping up failing lenders can stave off a worse economic crisis.

Ben Bernanke was the chairman of the US Federal Reserve at the time of Lehman Brother's collapse in 2008, which became one of the main catalysts of the world's worst financial turmoil since the Great Depression [File: Gary Cameron/Reuters]

A trio of US economists, including former Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, has won this year’s Nobel Prize in economics for laying the foundation of how world powers tackle global crises like the recent pandemic or the Great Recession of 2008.

Bernanke, Douglas Diamond and Philip Dybvig were recognised on Monday for their research on how regulating banks and propping up failing lenders with public cash can stave off an even deeper economic crisis, such as the Great Depression of the 1930s.

“The actions taken by central banks and financial regulators around the world in confronting two recent major crises – the Great Recession and the economic downturn that was generated by the COVID-19 pandemic – were in large part motivated by the laureates’ research,” the Swedish Academy said in announcing this year’s prize winners.

Governments around the world bailed out banks in 2008 and 2009, generating a torrent of criticism as ordinary consumers suffered. Many lost their homes even as banks, a key culprit of the crisis, were saved.

But society on the whole benefited and the bailouts, even if morally questionable to some, likely prevented more pain, the laureates’ research suggests.

“Even though these bailouts have problems, … they could actually be good for society,” Diamond, a University of Chicago professor, said at a news conference with the Swedish Academy. He argued that preventing the collapse of US investment bank Lehman Brothers would have made the 2008 crisis less severe.

“It probably would have been better if Lehman Brothers had not collapsed unexpectedly,” Diamond said. “Had they found a way, I think the world would have had less of a severe crisis.”

Douglas W. Diamond responds to a question during a news conference at The University of Chicago after winning the Nobel Prize for Economics
Douglas W Diamond (pictured) said that even though bailouts have problems, they can be good for the society [Charles Rex Arbogast/AP Photo]

Ironically, Bernanke was the chairman of the US Federal Reserve at the time of Lehman’s collapse, which became one of the main catalysts of the world’s biggest financial turmoil since the 1930s.

Bernanke, now a fellow at the Brooking Institution think-tank in Washington, argued at the time that there was no legal way to save Lehman so the next best thing was to let it fail and use the government’s financial resources to prevent wider systemic failures.

Part of that response, including ultra-low interest rates and massive central bank asset buys, are being reversed now as inflation is at its highest level in about half a century in many parts of the world.

The Nobel winners’ work also has implications for the current economic turmoil as raising interest rates at a record pace to fight inflation amplifies recession risks that will inevitably challenge the financial sector.

“Some households and some firms are already weakened,” said Gernot Doppelhofer, professor at the Norwegian School of Economics.

“This research shows how the finance system can amplify shocks and how it’s important to try to stabilise the economy while also ensuring the stability of the financial system,” he said.

Bank runs

Philip H. Dybvig plays ukulele before an interview in a hotel, in Boston, after winning the 2022 Nobel Prize for Economics
The work by Philip H Dybvig (pictured) and the other two economists has implications for the current economic turmoil [Josh Reynolds/AP Photo]

“What Bernanke did was to show that banks played a central role in turning relatively small recessions into the depression in the ’30s, and that was the worst economic crisis that the world has seen ever since,” said John Hassler, professor of economics and a member of the committee that awarded the Nobel Prize for economics.

Bank runs can easily become self-fulfilling, leading to the collapse of an institution and putting the entire financial sector at risk.

Dybvig, a professor at Washington University in St Louis, and Diamond argued that banks taking short-term deposits and lending this cash out in the long term is the most efficient way for the financial sector to operate.

But such an arrangement also made them prone to runs. Risks could be reduced via “delegated monitoring”, through which banks act as intermediaries between savers and borrowers.

This spreads out risks and ensures efficiency because banks are better suited to assess creditworthiness and monitor the use of funds, said the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, which awarded the prize.

The three economists will receive equal shares of the 10 million Swedish crown ($885,000) prize money.

They join such economic luminaries as Paul Krugman and Milton Friedman as winners of the prize.

The majority of previous laureates have been from the United States.

The economics prize is not one of the original five awards created in the 1895 will of industrialist and dynamite inventor Alfred Nobel.

It was established by Sweden’s central bank and first awarded in 1969.

Source: Reuters