US 'propaganda' row firm in Iraq deal

A US company that provoked controversy after it was found to have paid Iraqi newspapers and journalists to place stories favourable to coalition forces has been awarded another contract in Iraq.

    A covert Pentagon media campaign triggered controversy

    Lincoln Group drew widespread media attention last year 

    after the Los Angeles Times revealed in November that the company had been involved in the covert Pentagon operation.

    A company spokesman said on Tuesday that a two-year, $6.2 million contract to monitor English and Arabic media and produce "public relations products" for US forces in Iraq had been awarded to the Washington-based company.


    Bill Dixon said: "Lincoln Group is proud to be trusted to assist the multi-national forces in Iraq with communicating news about their vital work."

    The contract is also detailed in documents posted on a US government website which outlines contracts awarded.

    The list of media outlets to be monitored includes the New York Times, Fox Television and the satellite channel, Al-Arabiya.

    'Great concerns'

    Robert Andrews, a Democratic congressman who serves on the House Armed Services Committee, said he would be asking the US department of defence for information about how the "controversial" vendor was chosen, saying the choice of the Lincoln Group "concerns me greatly."

    "I wish that our problem in Iraq was that the military wasn't getting good PR"

    Robert Andrews, Democratic congressman

    "I wish that our problem in Iraq was that the military wasn't getting good PR," Andrews said.

    Lucy Dalglish, the executive director of The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, based in Arlington, Virginia, said she was worried about whether the military would be creating their own news through their own newspapers or websites.

    "If they're trying to influence Iraqi opinion of Americans, I almost find that to be unconscionable because that would say that they do not value a free and independent press in Iraq," Dalglish said.

    The Lincoln Group, which was formed in 2003, would not comment on details of the contract.

    'Losing battle'

    Lt. Col. Barry Johnson, a US military spokesman in Iraq, confirmed the award of the contract but would not comment on how the Lincoln Group was chosen, saying it was merely a "standard contracting process."

    "We always monitor the press. Any organisation, anywhere monitors the press to see what's being said, to determine what messages are out there and how it's impacting the environment," Johnson said.

    He said the contract did not include any provisions to purchase favourable coverage or pay for favourable stories.

    Multi-National Forces Iraq already has in place a contract with The Rendon Group, a Washington DC-based company, to perform similar work to the Lincoln Group.

    The Rendon Group contract, worth $6.4 million over a one-year period, was scheduled to expire this September but had

    been extended until October 27 in order for the winner of the new contract to be determined, Johnson said.

    Nabil Khalid, the executive news director of Al-Arabiya, a Dubai-based news organisation, says the multi-national forces in Iraq are losing the public relations battle.

    "If you asked me who better influences the media, the insurgents or the multi-national forces, I would say the insurgents," Khalid said.

    SOURCE: Agencies


    Interactive: How does your country vote at the UN?

    Interactive: How does your country vote at the UN?

    Explore how your country voted on global issues since 1946, as the world gears up for the 74th UN General Assembly.

    'We were forced out by the government soldiers'

    'We were forced out by the government soldiers'

    We dialled more than 35,000 random phone numbers to paint an accurate picture of displacement across South Sudan.

    Interactive: Plundering Cambodia's forests

    Interactive: Plundering Cambodia's forests

    Meet the man on a mission to take down Cambodia's timber tycoons and expose a rampant illegal cross-border trade.