Report warns US against Iran attack

Thousands of military personnel and hundreds of civilians would be killed if the United States launched an air strike on Iran to prevent it from developing nuclear arms, a British think tank has said in a new report.

    A US attack on Iran would cause hundreds of civilian casualties

    The report by the Oxford Research Group said on Monday that any bombing of Iran by US forces, or by their Israeli allies, would have to be part of a surprise attack that would inevitably catch many Iranians unprotected and could eventually lead to a lengthy confrontation involving many other countries in the region.

     

    An attack could lead to the closure of the Gulf at the Straits of Hormuz and would probably have a substantial impact on oil prices, as well as spurring new attacks by Muslim radicals on Western interests, the report said.

     

    "A US military attack on Iranian nuclear infrastructure would be the start of a protracted military confrontation that would probably involve Iraq, Israel and Lebanon as well as the United States and Iran, with the possibility of western Gulf States being involved as well.

     

    "Military deaths in (the) first wave of attacks against Iran would be expected to be in the thousands, especially with attacks on air bases and Revolutionary Guard facilities," said the report by Paul Rogers of the University of Bradford.

     

    "Civilian deaths would be in the many hundreds at least," it said. "If the war evolved into a wider conflict, primarily to pre-empt or counter Iranian responses, the casualties would eventually be much higher."

     

    Secret nuclear bomb

     

    "If the war evolved into a wider conflict, primarily to pre-empt or counter Iranian responses, the casualties would eventually be much higher."

    The Oxford Research Group report

    Western states suspect Iran of secretly aiming to build a nuclear bomb. Tehran, however, says its nuclear facilities are intended to produce only electricity.

     

    Washington and Jerusalem have said they would prefer to solve the dispute through diplomacy but have not ruled out military action.

     

    The report said an attack by the United States or Israel on Iran would probably spur Tehran to work as rapidly as possible towards developing a nuclear military option.

     

    It said US forces, already tied down in Iraq, would have a limited number of military options when dealing with Iran and would have to rely almost entirely on the air force and navy.

     

    Any attack would almost certainly unify Iran and bolster the government in Tehran, and would mean that any future US relationship with Iran would have to be based on violence, the report said.

     

    A military response to the crisis would be a "particularly dangerous option and should not be considered further", the report concluded.  

    SOURCE: Reuters


    YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

    'We scoured for days without sleeping, just clothes on our backs'

    'We scoured for days without sleeping, just clothes on our backs'

    The Philippines’ Typhoon Haiyan was the strongest storm ever to make landfall. Five years on, we revisit this story.

    How Moscow lost Riyadh in 1938

    How Moscow lost Riyadh in 1938

    Russian-Saudi relations could be very different today, if Stalin hadn't killed the Soviet ambassador to Saudi Arabia.

    Daughters of al-Shabab

    Daughters of al-Shabab

    What draws Kenyan women to join al-Shabab and what challenges are they facing when they return to their communities?