IOC clarifies protest rule

Athletes will be mindful of expressing any political opinions in Beijing.

    The IOC are hoping to avoid any debate regarding
    Tibet at the Olympics [AFP]

    With the Beijing Games less than 100 days away, the International Olympic Committee clarified its protest rules, saying that athletes' external appearance, clothing and gestures would be scrutinised in China.

    The IOC sent a six-point letter to the national Olympic federations in response to their request for interpretations of Rule 51.3 of the Olympic charter and left them with no doubt as to their stance on the issue.

    That rule states "no kind of demonstration or political, religious or racial propaganda is permitted in any Olympic sites, venues or other areas."

    The letter expanded on the rule, saying: "The conduct of participants at all sites, areas and venues includes all actions, reactions, attitudes or manifestations of any kind by a person or group of persons, including but not limited to their look, external appearance, clothing, gestures, and written or oral statements.''

    "As in all Olympic Games, such conduct must also, of course, comply with the laws of the host state.''

    Freedom of speech concerns

    The IOC has long relied on Rule 51.3 as its guiding principle for Olympic participants, but has been pressed of late to offer more guidance in light of recent protests over Tibet and China's crackdown on dissenters.

    Last month, IOC president Jacques Rogge said IOC officials will use common sense to decide whether athletes are simply celebrating victories or using them to make political statements.

    "Freedom of expression is something that is absolute. It's a human right. Athletes have it,'' Rogge said, however he made it clear that any protests would be met with sanctions by the IOC.

    The IOC letter said that, indeed, Olympic athletes are free to express their opinions, so long as those expressions are in compliance with the Olympic charter.

    It gave athletes permission to answer questions on any topic in media interviews and said the rule relied on the "common sense of all athletes and other participants in showing respect for the dignity of all fellow athletes, including those of the host country.''

    The letter reiterated the IOC's oft-stated position that the Olympics are a "great sports festival."

    "They are not a stage for different kinds of political statements about issues such as armed conflicts, regional differences, religious disputes and many others,'' it said.

    Protests aplenty

    This position differs with the actual history of the games, which have been marked by political gestures, boycotts and violence during the past four decades.

    One of the iconic Olympic pictures of the 20th century was that of American sprinters Tommie Smith and John Carlos on the medals stand in 1968 after the men's 200 meters, raising their black-gloved fists and bowing their heads in a racial protest aimed at American society during the playing of U.S. national anthem.

    That type of display would presumably be forbidden in Beijing, though the short letter did not outline possible sanctions for violating Rule 51.3.

    The letter asked national organising committees to contact their athletes with the new information.

    "Everyone concerned ... should also respect the personal rights of each individual athlete, which include both the right to express themselves and the right not to comment on political issues," the letter said.

    SOURCE: Agencies


    Cricket World Cup 2019 Quiz: How many runs can you score?

    Cricket World Cup 2019 Quiz: How many runs can you score?

    Pick your team and answer as many correct questions in three minutes.

    Visualising every Saudi coalition air raid on Yemen

    Visualising every Saudi coalition air raid on Yemen

    Since March 2015, Saudi Arabia and a coalition of Arab states have launched more than 19,278 air raids across Yemen.

    Remembering Chernobyl

    Remembering Chernobyl

    The fallout from the Chernobyl nuclear power plant explosion remains as politicised as ever, 28 years on.