Iraqis march against US agreement

Al-Sadr supporters fear a security deal would mean permanent colonisation of Iraq.

    Supporters of al-Sadr protested the US pact after Friday prayer in Baghdad [AFP]

    They would remain on bases across the country, however, providing backup support to Iraqi forces until the end of 2011.

    When finalised, the pact will still have to be ratified by the Iraqi parliament and the veto-wielding presidency council.

    Public outcry

    Al-Sadr and other critics fear that the pullout deal will bind the US and Iraq into a long-term security relationship, instead of restoring Iraqi sovereignty.

    In Kufa, about 2,000 protesters marched after Friday prayers, chanting "No to America" and wielding portraits of al-Sadr and waving Iraqi flags.

    Some held up banners reading "The dubious agreement means a permanent colonisation of Iraq" and "Iraq is not a US colony".

    An aide to al-Sadr, Sheik Dia al-Shawki, told those gathered that the deal goes against the will of the Iraqi people.

    In Baghdad's Sadr City district, supporters set fire to American flags while local leaders denounced an ambiguous agreement "that the Iraqi people know nothing about".

    One of the most contentious issues of the security deal is Iraqi jurisdiction over US soldiers and military contractors, as the Iraqi forces assume greater responsibility.

    The draft agreement says that private US contractors would be subject to Iraqi law - unlike at present. However, US troops would remain under US jurisdiction.

    Mohammed Hamoud Bidan, Iraq's deputy foreign minister, on Friday told CNN that jurisdiction would be determined by a joint legal committee in cases of US citizens who commit major crimes against Iraqi civilians.

    The deputy minister also repeated June 30 as the deadline for a US troop pullout from Iraqi cities.


    YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

    Interactive: How does your country vote at the UN?

    Interactive: How does your country vote at the UN?

    We visualised 1.2 million votes at the UN since 1946. What do you think are the biggest issues facing the world today?

    'We were forced out by the government soldiers'

    'We were forced out by the government soldiers'

    We dialled more than 35,000 random phone numbers to paint an accurate picture of displacement across South Sudan.

    Interactive: Plundering Cambodia's forests

    Interactive: Plundering Cambodia's forests

    Meet the man on a mission to take down Cambodia's timber tycoons and expose a rampant illegal cross-border trade.