London denies UK Muslim spy charge

Government says anti-extremism programme not used to spy on British Muslims.

    London has more CCTV cameras than any other capital in the world [AFP]

    But in a critical report, the Institute of Race Relations claimed the programme has, in effect, established "one of the most elaborate systems of surveillance ever seen in Britain".

    Counter-productive?

    Arun Kundnani, the report's author, concludes that far from tackling extremism, Prevent actually fostered division, mistrust and alienation.

    "The Prevent progamme constructs the Muslim population as a 'suspect community' ... encourages tokenism, facilitates violations of privacy and professional norms of confidentiality, discourages local democracy and is counter-productive in reducing the risk of political violence", Kundnani said.

    "It is information-gathering directed at the innocent and the spying is directed at people because of their religion, and not because of their behaviour"

    Shami Chakrabarti, director, UK-based political rights watchdog Liberty

    Shami Chakrabarti, the director of UK-based political rights watchdog Liberty, also branded Prevent the biggest spying programme in Britain in modern times and "an affront to civil liberties".

    "It is information-gathering directed at the innocent and the spying is directed at people because of their religion, and not because of their behaviour."

    She noted that the information that the authorities is gathering includes political views, information on mental health, sexual activity and associates and other sensitive information.

    And according to other documents presented to the UK's Guardian newspaper on Saturday, Prevent's intelligence and information can be stored until the people concerned reach the age of 100.

    The newspaper also published instances of abuse of the programme, such as lecturers reporting students who attended lectures on Gaza and youth projects pressured to give names of youths to the Metropolitan police as a condition of funding.

    Another opinion

    But not all Islamic groups agree that Prevent has been abused.

    Ed Husain, of the UK-based Quilliam Foundation, which has advised both the Labour party and the Conservative party on Islamic extremism and whose foundation receives more tha $1m a year in funding from Prevent, said intelligence-gathering before an attack was better than dealing with it afterwards.

    "It is gathering intelligence on people not committing terrorist offences - it is morally right to give law enforcement agencies the best chance of stopping terrorists before they strike," he said.

    Prevent is run by the Office for Security and Counter Terrorism, a part of the interior ministry.

    SOURCE: Agencies


    YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

    Interactive: How does your country vote at the UN?

    Interactive: How does your country vote at the UN?

    We visualised 1.2 million votes at the UN since 1946. What do you think are the biggest issues facing the world today?

    'We were forced out by the government soldiers'

    'We were forced out by the government soldiers'

    We dialled more than 35,000 random phone numbers to paint an accurate picture of displacement across South Sudan.

    Interactive: Plundering Cambodia's forests

    Interactive: Plundering Cambodia's forests

    Meet the man on a mission to take down Cambodia's timber tycoons and expose a rampant illegal cross-border trade.