Turkey PM wants headscarf ban eased

The secular elite criticises the prime minister's wish to let students wear hijab.

    Erdogan says the right to education cannot be restricted because of what a girl wears [EPA]

    He said: "There is no such problem in Western societies, but there is a problem in Turkey and I believe it is the first duty of those in politics to solve the problem."
     
    The wearing of the hijab in universities was first banned shortly after a 1980 coup by military officers who viewed Islamists as a serious threat.
     
    But the implementation of that rule varied during the law's early years.
     
    Erdogan's apparent desire to include in the constitution an easing of the ban on the hijab in universities has predictably alarmed the secular elite.
     
    The latter views the hijab as a symbolic threat to the separation of religion and state.
     
    Alternative wordings
     
    A copy of the first draft published by Turkish media includes alternative wordings for a possible article that would allow the hijab to be worn on campuses.

    The wearing of the hijab in universities was
    banned after a 1980 military coup [EPA]

    University rectors and the head of Turkey's court of appeals both warned on Wednesday against any change in this regulation.
     
    The head of Turkey's Higher Education Board - a well-known secularist law scholar - condemned Erdogan's move to lift the headscarf ban.
     
    Erdogan Tezic said: "It is our mission to remind the public that any constitutional regulation that would abolish restrictions on clothing is illegal."
     
    Ayse Ayata, a professor at Ankara's Middle East Technical University, said: "The lifting of the ban could lead to increased community pressure on uncovered women to cover up."
     
    Constitution question
     
    Erdogan on Wednesday rejected criticism that his governing Justice and Development (AK) party wanted to impose its own constitutional text on Turkey and pledged full, open discussions in parliament, the media and elsewhere.
     
    The new constitution would replace a document that dates back to a period of military rule in Turkey in the early 1980s.
     
    He said: "It's time to have a modern constitution that represents our nation's common sense and wisdom ... that will realise the ideal of a free Turkey."
     
    But Ayata argued that the draft text risked eroding Turkey's system of checks and balances by giving parliament and the government too much power.
     
    Charter debate
     
    The AK party, which won a five-year mandate in July elections, says the new charter would favour the individual over the state and bring Turkey more into line with the European Union, which Ankara hopes to join.
     

    The secular elite failed to stop Gul from
    becoming president in August [Reuters]

    Turkey's army, which views itself as the ultimate guarantor of secularism, is closely following the constitutional debates, as are nervous financial markets.

    Ten years ago, the military ousted a government it saw as too Islamist.
     
    In April, the army tried to stop the AK party's Abdullah Gul from becoming president in an election in parliament because of his Islamist roots and his wife's hijab.
     
    Gul finally became president in August after the standoff with the army triggered early parliamentary elections which the AK party won resoundingly.

    SOURCE: Al Jazeera and agencies


    YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

    Interactive: How does your country vote at the UN?

    Interactive: How does your country vote at the UN?

    We visualised 1.2 million votes at the UN since 1946. What do you think are the biggest issues facing the world today?

    'We were forced out by the government soldiers'

    'We were forced out by the government soldiers'

    We dialled more than 35,000 random phone numbers to paint an accurate picture of displacement across South Sudan.

    Interactive: Plundering Cambodia's forests

    Interactive: Plundering Cambodia's forests

    Meet the man on a mission to take down Cambodia's timber tycoons and expose a rampant illegal cross-border trade.