Observers say Kyrgyz vote flawed

OSCE statement strengthens opposition claims of fraud in presidential poll.

    The opposition has refused to recognise the vote, saying it was marred by widespread fraud [AFP]

    "Sadly, this election did not show the progress we were hoping for and it again fell short of key standards Kyrgyzstan has committed to as a participating state of the OSCE," it said.

    "The conduct of election day was a disappointment."

    Fraud claims

    The OSCE report adds weight to opposition claims of electoral fraud.

    Almazbek Atambayev, the leading opposition challenger, had earlier refused to recognise the vote, claiming widespread vote-rigging and intimidation of election monitors.

    In depth


     Opposition fears in Kyrgyz election

    He also charged that the official turnout was inflated.

    The dispute could heighten political tensions in the Central Asian nation, where stability is in the interests of Russia and the US.

    Washington maintains an air base in Kyrgyzstan crucial to its operations in Afghanistan.

    Hours before the polls closed, Atambayev announced he was taking himself out of the race in protest, though legal issues prevented him from officially withdrawing.

    Some 1,500 supporters gathered at the opposition headquarters on the outskirts of the capital Bishkek as polling stations closed.

    But a planned march to the election commission office fizzled out after opposition leaders urged supporters to disperse, saying the authorities were planning to provoke violence and then blame it on them.

    Opposition efforts

    Bakiyev was elected in 2005, in a poll seen as free and fair by Western observers.

    But since then he has been accused by the opposition of becoming increasingly repressive and a string of mysterious attacks on politicians and journalists in the run-up to the election raised concerns.

    Robin Forestier-Walker, reporting for Al Jazeera from Bishkek, said Bakiyev had done several things to strengthen his hand, including increasing government spending and boosting salaries and pensions.

    "He held parliamentary elections in 2007, which effectively removed any significant opposition from the parliament, so they effectively say 'yes' to all of his policies and vote him through," he said.

    "That's left the political opposition without much to hold on to.

    "They've been trying to mount a campaign since the end of last year to try to force the president to return to a more democratic mandate."

    SOURCE: Al Jazeera and agencies


    YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

    Learn what India's parties' symbols mean by drawing them

    Learn what India's parties' symbols mean by drawing them

    More than 2,300 political parties have registered for the largest electoral exercise in the world.

    Visualising every Saudi coalition air raid on Yemen

    Visualising every Saudi coalition air raid on Yemen

    Since March 2015, Saudi Arabia and a coalition of Arab states have launched more than 19,278 air raids across Yemen.

    Why did Bush go to war in Iraq?

    Why did Bush go to war in Iraq?

    No, it wasn't because of WMDs, democracy or Iraqi oil. The real reason is much more sinister than that.