Bhutan holds practice election

Mock parties contest the vote ahead of a planned democratic transition.

    Saturday's election is meant as a dress rehearsal for next year's polls [Reuters]

    'No power struggle'
    Jigme Singye Wangchuck, Bhutan's former king, decided to hand power of the mainly Buddhist country to an elected government, against the will of his advisers and many subjects, before passing his crown to his 26-year-old Oxford-educated son last year.
    Khandu Wangchuk, Bhutan's prime minister, said: "It was not on account of any external or internal pressure, there was no power struggle of any kind."

    Bhutan's transition contrasts with the nearby kingdom of Nepal, where King Gyanendra made an ill-fated attempt to take dictatorial powers and now risks his monarchy being dismantled.


    As recently as the 1960s, Bhutan had no roads and practically no schools or hospitals. Today education and healthcare are free, and life expectancy has risen to 66 years, from less than 40, a fact most people attribute to the monarch's rule.


    Democracy fears


    Bhutan's former king, right, handed power to
    his Oxford-educated son, left, last year [AFP]

    But, with conflicts in Bangladesh, Nepal and India, many Bhutanese worry democracy may lead to corruption and strife.


    Gopilal Acharya, 28, editor of the Bhutan Times, a private newspaper launched last year as part of moves towards a free press, said: "We live in a very unstable region.


    "In some of our neighbours democracy has not really worked, so people are a bit sceptical whether it will work in Bhutan."


    Four mock parties are contesting the vote and have been given imaginary platforms stressing fairness and accountability, the environment, industrial development and traditional values.


    A 2006 study by a British scientist ranked Bhutan the eighth happiest country in the world, just behind Sweden, despite its having an average national income of $740.


    Nepali refugees


    But human rights group have criticised the country for abuses, including its deportation of tens of thousands of ethnic Nepalis, mostly Hindus, from south Bhutan after they protested against discrimination - and for democracy - in 1990.


    Bhutan says most were illegal immigrants. But the refugees, now living in camps in Nepal, say they had lived in Bhutan for generations and are victims of ethnic cleansing.


    An ex-soldier of Nepali origin, refusing to give his name, said: "Those who fought for democracy have been driven away. If the Bhutanese government really wanted to give democracy, those people should be allowed to come back and vote."


    As for real political parties, only two have been formed, disappointing those who had hoped for real debate ahead of next year's elections. One, likely to be led by Wangchuck's brother-in-law, Sangay Ngedup, is strongly tipped to take power.

    SOURCE: Agencies


    Interactive: How does your country vote at the UN?

    Interactive: How does your country vote at the UN?

    Explore how your country voted on global issues since 1946, as the world gears up for the 74th UN General Assembly.

    'We were forced out by the government soldiers'

    'We were forced out by the government soldiers'

    We dialled more than 35,000 random phone numbers to paint an accurate picture of displacement across South Sudan.

    Interactive: Plundering Cambodia's forests

    Interactive: Plundering Cambodia's forests

    Meet the man on a mission to take down Cambodia's timber tycoons and expose a rampant illegal cross-border trade.