New York Times denies sexism in firing row

Arthur Sulzberger accuses Jill Abramson of 'arbitrary decision making and public mistreatment of colleagues'.

    New York Times denies sexism in firing row
    Jill Abramson was the first female executive editor in the paper's 160-year history [EPA]

    The publisher of the New York Times has defended his decision to sack the paper's first female executive editor, denied her removal was sexist and listed her shortcomings as a manager.

    Arthur Sulzberger Jr, in a 500-word statement issued on Saturday, rejected claims he had fired Jill Abramson because of gender bias.

    Instead, he cited "arbitrary decision-making, a failure to consult, inadequate communication and the public mistreatment of colleagues" as reasons for her dismissal.

    Abramson, the paper's first female executive editor, was sacked on Wednesday. She was the first woman to hold the position in the New York Times' 160-year history.

    Her abrupt exit led to intense speculation about whether sexism or salaries were behind her departure. But Sulzberger on Saturday described these as "persistent, incorrect reports".

    "Her management of the newsroom was simply not working out. 

    "Many of our key leaders are women. So too are many of our rising stars. They do not look for special treatment, but expect to be treated with the same respect as their male colleagues. For that reason they want to be judged fairly and objectively on their performance. That is what happened in the case of Jill."

    Abramson has not publicly commented on her dismissal.

    SOURCE: Agencies


    YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

    Visualising every Saudi coalition air raid on Yemen

    Visualising every Saudi coalition air raid on Yemen

    Since March 2015, Saudi Arabia and a coalition of Arab states have launched more than 19,278 air raids across Yemen.

    Lost childhoods: Nigeria's fear of 'witchcraft' ruins young lives

    Lost childhoods: Nigeria's fear of 'witchcraft' ruins young lives

    Many Pentecostal churches in the Niger Delta offer to deliver people from witchcraft and possession - albeit for a fee.

    Why did Bush go to war in Iraq?

    Why did Bush go to war in Iraq?

    No, it wasn't because of WMDs, democracy or Iraqi oil. The real reason is much more sinister than that.