US rejects landmine ban treaty

Officials says banning the weapon would jeopardise the country's "defence needs".

    Landmines cause thousands of deaths and injuries each year [GALLO/GETTY] 

    The US decision comes just days before a review conference on the 10-year-old Mine Ban Treaty, credited with reducing landmine casualties around the world, is due to get under way in Cartegena, Colombia.

    The treaty plans to end the production, use, stockpiling and trade in landmines.

    Besides the US, countries holding out on the agreement include China, India, Pakistan, Myanmar and Russia.

    'Lost opportunity'

    Patrick Leahy, a US senator and a leading advocate for the treaty, called the decision "a default of US leadership" and criticised the state department's policy review as "cursory and half-hearted".

    "It is a lost opportunity for the United States to show leadership instead of joining with China and Russia and impeding progress"

    Patrick Leahy,
    US senator

    "It is a lost opportunity for the United States to show leadership instead of joining with China and Russia and impeding progress," Leahy said in a statement.

    Landmines are known to have caused 5,197 casualties last year, a third of them children, according to the Nobel prize-winning International Campaign to Ban Landmines.

    Kelly said the US would still attend the conference next Sunday, which is expected to draw more than 1,000 delegates from more than 100 countries, including ministers and heads of state.

    "As a global provider of security, we have an interest in the discussions there," he said.

    "But we will be there as an observer, obviously, because we haven't signed the convention, nor do we plan to sign the convention."

    US observers

    Anti-landmine campaigners welcomed the development as it will be the first time the US will send observers to a gathering of states that have accepted the treaty.

    "The very fact that they are showing up we take as a positive sign of movement on this issue within the [Barack] Obama administration," Steve Goose, director of the arms division of Human Rights Watch, said, referring to the US president.

    "We hope they're not coming empty-handed."

    To some extent the US already abides by the provisions of the treaty.

    Goose noted that America has not used anti-personnel mines since the 1991 Gulf War, has not exported any since 1992 and has not produced them since 1997.

    SOURCE: Agencies


    YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

    'We scoured for days without sleeping, just clothes on our backs'

    'We scoured for days without sleeping, just clothes on our backs'

    The Philippines’ Typhoon Haiyan was the strongest storm ever to make landfall. Five years on, we revisit this story.

    How Moscow lost Riyadh in 1938

    How Moscow lost Riyadh in 1938

    Russian-Saudi relations could be very different today, if Stalin hadn't killed the Soviet ambassador to Saudi Arabia.

    Daughters of al-Shabab

    Daughters of al-Shabab

    What draws Kenyan women to join al-Shabab and what challenges are they facing when they return to their communities?