Iraq contractors 'cost US $85bn'

US report says about 20 per cent of money spent in Iraq has gone to contractors.

    The work of contractors in Iraq is under
    increased scrutiny [AFP]

    The report sparked heavy criticism by US Democrats, with Senator Kent Conrad, chairman of the US senate budget committee, saying the reliance on contractors "restricts accountability and oversight; opens the door to corruption and abuse and ... may significantly increase the cost to American taxpayers".

    The study did not include figures for 2008 and therefore the total paid to
    contractors for work in Iraq since the invasion could be even higher, possibly topping $100 billion by the end of this year, the report said.

    The US military has relied increasingly on contractors in its wars as it reduced the size of its own forces.

    Increased scrutiny

    The CBO estimated on Tuesday that between $6 billion to $10 billion has gone to pay for security work in Iraq, which was comparable to the costs of having a US military unit performing the same tasks.

    The work of contractors in Iraq - of whom between 25,000 to 30,000 are in security work - has faced increased scrutiny following a series of fatal incidents involving Iraqi civilians.

    Last September, 17 Iraqis were killed in a shooting involving contractors from
    Blackwater security company, an incident that provoked furious protests from the Iraqi government and strained relations with the US.

    The US Justice Department is expected to decide soon whether to bring charges over the incident, although Blackwater itself is not expected to be prosecuted.

    The firm recently announced that they planned to scale back their security
    contracting business and focus on other areas, due in part to negative publicity from the shooting.

    In addition, contracting companies such as Halliburton, previously run by Dick Cheney, the US vice-president, and KBR, formerly known as Kellogg, Brown and Root, have also been accused of overcharging and corruption.

    Charles Tiefer, a professor of government contracting at the University of Baltimore Law School, told the New York Times newspaper that the scale of contractor usage in Iraq was "unprecedented".

    "It was considered an all-out imperative by the administration to keep troop levels low, particularly in the beginning of the war, and one way that was done was to shift money and manpower to contractors," he told the paper.

    "But that has exposed the military to greater risks from contractor waste and abuse."

    SOURCE: Agencies


    Learn what India's parties' symbols mean by drawing them

    Learn what India's parties' symbols mean by drawing them

    More than 2,300 political parties have registered for the largest electoral exercise in the world.

    Visualising every Saudi coalition air raid on Yemen

    Visualising every Saudi coalition air raid on Yemen

    Since March 2015, Saudi Arabia and a coalition of Arab states have launched more than 19,278 air raids across Yemen.

    Why did Bush go to war in Iraq?

    Why did Bush go to war in Iraq?

    No, it wasn't because of WMDs, democracy or Iraqi oil. The real reason is much more sinister than that.