CIA told interrogations were legal

Newly released US justice department memo said CIA could use harsh interrogations.

    Rights activists have condemned interrogation methods such as waterboarding [Reuters]

    However, it also warned that if circumstances changed, interrogators could be prosecuted under anti-torture laws.

    The standards used to judge how physically rough an interrogation was were censored.

    "The healthier the individual, the less likely that the use of any one procedure or set of procedures will result in prolonged mental harm."

    Jay Bybee,
    assistant attorney-general who wrote memo

    But interrogations that stressed a detainee psychologically or emotionally were not allowed to cause "prolonged mental harm".

    The memo suggested psychiatrists or psychologists should be consulted prior to interrogations to assess the likely mental health effect on the prisoner.

    "The healthier the individual, the less likely that the use of any one procedure or set of procedures will result in prolonged mental harm," the memo stated.

    Bybee wrote the memo the same day he wrote one for Alberto Gonzales, the then-White House counsel, that defined torture as only those "extreme acts" that cause pain similar in intensity to that caused by death or organ failure.

    The Bybee legal opinion defining torture was withdrawn more than two years later.

    Waterboarding

    For several years, the Bush administration relied on the findings issued in 2002 to maintain its interrogations did not amount to torture and had not violated any US or international treaties on treatment of detainees.

    The Bush administration maintains waterboarding, which simulates the sensation of drowning, was legal when it was used by CIA interrogators in 2002 and 2003 against al-Qaeda suspects Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, Abu Zubaydah and Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri.

    Michael Mukasey, the US attorney-general, has refused to rule on the legality of waterboarding, saying he would only do so if the CIA sought to use it again.

    George Bush, the US president, has vetoed an attempt to ban its use.

    The practice has been widely condemned by international human rights groups.

    SOURCE: Agencies


    YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

    Survivor stories from Super Typhoon Haiyan

    Survivor stories from Super Typhoon Haiyan

    The Philippines’ Typhoon Haiyan was the strongest storm ever to make landfall. Five years on, we revisit this story.

    How Moscow lost Riyadh in 1938

    How Moscow lost Riyadh in 1938

    Russian-Saudi relations could be very different today, if Stalin hadn't killed the Soviet ambassador to Saudi Arabia.

    We Are Still Here: A Story from Native Alaska

    We Are Still Here: A Story from Native Alaska

    From Qatar to Alaska, a personal journey exploring what it means to belong when your culture is endangered.