Senate cripples US immigration bill

Senators vote against limiting debate on plans to legalise millions of immigrants.

    Senator Kennedy, left, was one of the
    main architects of the bill [AFP]

    But a crowded senate calendar complicates the bill's chances of being re-tabled in the future.
     
    In the House of Representatives, Democratic leaders do not intend to act on the issue until the senate has finished considering it.
     
    Tightening borders
     
    The legislation would tighten borders and institute a new system to prevent employers from hiring undocumented workers, in addition to giving up to 12 million illegal immigrants a pathway to legal status.
     

    "Doing nothing is not an alternative. This issue isn't going away"

    Edward M Kennedy, Democratic senator

    Many in the senate argued they needed more time to make the bill tougher with tighter border security measures and a more arduous legalisation process for unlawful immigrants.
     
    Even those who support the bill have argued that it would make second-class citizens of temporary workers and would prioritise employability over family ties in future immigration.
     
    "We can all find different aspects of this legislation that we differ with," said senator Edward M Kennedy, a Democratic and one of the architects of the bill.
     
    But he said he hoped the measure would survive the vote, saying: "Doing nothing is not an alternative. This issue isn't going away."
     
    Compromise
     
    Kennedy had partnered with senator Jon Kyl, a republican, and several others to create the bill, essentially a compromise that tired to balance tougher border security and limits to immigration with plans to legalise millions of people who are living and working in the US unlawfully.
     
    Kyl, however, broke from the bipartisan clique that hatched the agreement, siding with Republicans who said they hadn't gotten enough chances to toughen the bill.
     
    "It's time to scrap this mess of a bill," said Jim DeMint, a republican senator who had failed in several attempts to make the measure more punitive toward illegal immigrants.
     
    Senator Arlen Specter, a Republican and another proponent of the bill, said he believed "that we will yet succeed".
     
    Frank Sharry, the executive director of the National Immigration Forum, called the vote "a huge disappointment to immigrant communities and those seeking a solution to the dysfunctional immigration system".
     
    He said: "We fear the result was a matter of politicians, particularly Republicans, not wanting to confront obstinate members of their own parties in order to let the majority's will, and the people's will, prevail."
     
    A survey, conducted between May 30 and June 3 by the Pew Research Centre for the People and the Press, found that about two-thirds of the American public were in favour of the bill's proposal to give illegal immigrants citizenship if they have jobs, pass background checks and pay fines.

    SOURCE: Agencies


    YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

    Survivor stories from Super Typhoon Haiyan

    Survivor stories from Super Typhoon Haiyan

    The Philippines’ Typhoon Haiyan was the strongest storm ever to make landfall. Five years on, we revisit this story.

    How Moscow lost Riyadh in 1938

    How Moscow lost Riyadh in 1938

    Russian-Saudi relations could be very different today, if Stalin hadn't killed the Soviet ambassador to Saudi Arabia.

    We Are Still Here: A Story from Native Alaska

    We Are Still Here: A Story from Native Alaska

    From Qatar to Alaska, a personal journey exploring what it means to belong when your culture is endangered.