Rice confronted over Iran evidence

US administration challenged over its claims of Iranian nuclear weapon development.

    Rice said the US was not planning an attack
    against Iran [EPA]

    'Echoes of Iraq'

     

    Paul was speaking as Rice presented the US state department's annual budget request to the congressional foreign affairs committee on Capitol Hill in Washington on Wednesday.

     

    Your Views


    Send us your views

    He said: "This sounds like Iraq, where accusations came first and proof was supposed to come later – only that proof never came because the accusations turned out to be false."

     

    Paul referred to discredited allegations that Saddam Hussein's government was building weapons of mass destruction.

     

    US officials have promised to make public what Sean McCormack, a state department spokesman, described as a "mountain of evidence" to back up allegations about Iranian involvement in attacks on US and allied forces in Iraq.

     

    No such evidence has yet been put forward by the administration.

     

    'No Iran attack plan'

     

    Rejecting Paul's suggestions, Rice said: "We are not planning or intending an attack on Iran.

     

    "What we are doing is responding to a number of Iranian policies both in Iran and around the world that are actually quite dangerous for our national security."

     

    "We're going to do this on our own timeline"

    Sean McCormack, State Department spokesman

    Rice also said that Iranian support for "terrorism" was "well known and well-understood", referring to Hezbollah in Lebanon and sectarian death squads in Iraq.

     

    She said British forces in Iraq had also linked Iran to attacks on allied forces in the country, notably with sophisticated bombs able to penetrate armoured vehicles.

     

    'No hurry'

     

    Rice said: "I don't think any government in the world would stand by and not react to that."

     

    McCormack rejected suggestions the administration had yet to reveal its proof of Iranian involvement in Iraq because the evidence was not strong enough to convince sceptics.

     

    "We're going to do this on our own timeline," he said.

     

    "There are always going to be doubters, critics, sceptics ... That's fine, we accept that."

     

    "It's not going to influence us into hurrying through something that we don't think is ready or appropriate."

    SOURCE: Agencies


    YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

    Survivor stories from Super Typhoon Haiyan

    Survivor stories from Super Typhoon Haiyan

    The Philippines’ Typhoon Haiyan was the strongest storm ever to make landfall. Five years on, we revisit this story.

    How Moscow lost Riyadh in 1938

    How Moscow lost Riyadh in 1938

    Russian-Saudi relations could be very different today, if Stalin hadn't killed the Soviet ambassador to Saudi Arabia.

    We Are Still Here: A Story from Native Alaska

    We Are Still Here: A Story from Native Alaska

    From Qatar to Alaska, a personal journey exploring what it means to belong when your culture is endangered.