The Biden administration is holding tens of thousands of asylum-seeking children in an opaque network of some 200 facilities that spans two dozen states and includes five shelters with more than 1,000 children packed inside, according to the Associated Press news agency.
Confidential data obtained by the AP shows the number of migrant children in government custody more than doubled in the past two months, and this week the federal government was housing around 21,000 kids, from toddlers to teens.
A facility at Fort Bliss, a US Army post in El Paso, Texas, had more than 4,500 children as of Monday.
Lawyers, advocates and mental health experts say that while some shelters are safe and provide adequate care, others are endangering children’s health and safety.
“It’s almost like ‘Groundhog Day,’” said Southern Poverty Law Center lawyer Luz Lopez, referring to the 1993 film in which events appear to be continually repeating.
“Here we are back to a point almost where we started, where the government is using taxpayer money to build large holding facilities … for children instead of using that money to find ways to more quickly reunite children with their sponsors.”
A US Department of Health and Human Services spokesman, Mark Weber, said the department’s staff and contractors are working hard to keep children in their custody safe and healthy.
A few of the current practices are the same as those that President Joe Biden and others criticised under the administration of former president Donald Trump, including not vetting some caregivers with full FBI fingerprint background checks.
At the same time, court records show the Biden administration is working to settle several multimillion-dollar lawsuits that claim migrant children were abused in shelters under Trump.
Part of the government’s plan to manage thousands of children crossing the US-Mexico border involves about a dozen unlicensed emergency facilities inside military installations, stadiums and convention centres that skirt state regulations and do not require traditional legal oversight.
Inside the facilities, called Emergency Intake Sites, children are not guaranteed access to education, recreational opportunities or legal counsel.
Some of the facilities currently holding children are run by contractors already facing lawsuits claiming that children were physically and sexually abused in their shelters under the Trump administration, while others are new companies with little or no experience working with migrant children.
In a recent news release, the administration touted its “restoration of a child centered focus for unaccompanied children,” and it has been sharing daily totals of the number of children in government custody as well as a few photos of the facilities. This reflects a higher level of transparency than the Trump administration.
In addition, the amount of time children spend, on average, inside the system has dropped from four months last fall (autumn) to less than a month this spring, according to the Department of Health and Human Services.
Nonetheless, the agency has received reports of abuse that resulted in a handful of contract staffers being dismissed from working at the emergency sites this year, according to an official who was not authorised to discuss the matter publicly and spoke on the condition of anonymity.
‘No one would tell me any information’
Lawyers say sometimes, even parents cannot figure out where their children are.
Jose, a father who fled El Salvador after his village was targeted in a massacre, requested asylum in the US four years ago.
He had hoped to welcome his wife and eight-year-old daughter to Southern California this year, but the pair were turned around at the border in March and expelled to Mexico.
The little girl crossed again by herself and was placed in the government shelter in Brownsville, Texas, on April 6.
Jose called a government hotline set up for parents seeking their migrant children repeatedly but said no one would tell him where she was.
“I was so upset because I kept calling and calling, and no one would tell me any information about where she was,” said Jose, who asked to be identified only by his first name out of fear of endangering his immigration case.
“Finally they told me I had to pay $1,300 to cover her airplane ticket and if I didn’t pay, I would have to wait a month more, and I was so anxious.”
For nearly three weeks, his daughter was held inside the Brownsville facility before finally being released to him in late April after an advocacy organisation intervened to get the government to foot the bill for her airfare, as is required by the agency.
HHS declined to say whether there are any legally enforceable standards for caring for children housed at the emergency sites or how they are being monitored.
The Biden administration has allowed very limited access to news media once children are brought into facilities, citing the coronavirus pandemic and privacy restrictions.
“HHS has worked as swiftly as possible to increase bed capacity and to ensure potential sponsors can provide a safe home while the child goes through their immigration proceedings,” HHS spokesman Weber said in a statement.
“As soon as wrap around services – on-site primary care, including childhood immunizations and physicals, case management, phone calls to family members, education, recreation etc – become available as a result of additional infrastructure and staff, they are provided as part of the operation.”
Weber confirmed a number of specific shelter populations from the data the AP obtained.
Of particular concern to advocates are mass shelters, with hundreds of beds apiece. These facilities can leave children isolated, less supervised and without basic services.
The AP found about half of all migrant children detained in the US are sleeping in shelters with more than 1,000 other children. More than 17,650 are in facilities with 100 or more children. Some shelters and foster programmes are small, little more than a house with a handful of kids.
A large Houston facility abruptly closed last month after it was revealed that children were being given plastic bags instead of access to restrooms.
“The system has been very dysfunctional, and it’s getting worse,” said Amy Cohen, a child psychiatrist and executive director of the nonprofit Every Last One, which works to help immigrant families fleeing violence in Central America. Although there have been large numbers of children arriving in the US for years, Cohen said she has never seen the situation as bad as it is today.
Cohen described parents receiving calls from people refusing to identify themselves.
They are told to be at an airport or bus station in the next two hours to pick up their children, who have been held for more than a month without notice, or they would not be released.
Some parents are told to pay a travel agency thousands of dollars to have their child sent to them, she said.
“The children are coming out sick, with COVID, infested with lice, and it will not surprise me to see children dying as a consequence, as we saw during the Trump years,” Cohen said. “The Biden administration is feverishly putting up these pop-up detention facilities, many of which have no experience working with children.”
One reason so many children are now arriving without their parents dates back to a 2020 Trump administration emergency order that essentially closed the US-Mexico border to all migrants, citing public health concerns about spreading COVID-19.
That emergency order still applies to adults, but the Biden administration has begun allowing children travelling without their parents to stay and seek asylum if they enter the country. As a result, some parents are sending their kids across the border by themselves.
Most already have a parent or other adult relative or family friend, known as a sponsor, in the US waiting to receive them. But first, they are typically detained by US Customs and Border Protection, or CBP, then turned over to a government shelter.
“As much as having children spend days on end at CBP is unacceptable, so, too, is having children spend weeks on end in unlicensed Emergency Intake Sites,” said National Center for Youth Law lawyer Neha Desai. “With every passing day, it is increasingly critical that these children are released to sponsors or transferred to licensed facilities.”