Mix and matching some COVID vaccines gives high immunity: Study

Oxford University study finds mixing a first dose of the Pfizer or Astrazeneca vaccine with a second Moderna shot yields higher antibodies.

Many countries have been deploying a mix-and-match approach well before robust data was available [File: Kirsty Wigglesworth/AP Photo]

A major British study into mixing COVID-19 vaccines has found that people had a better immune response when they received a first dose of AstraZeneca or Pfizer-BioNTech shots followed by Moderna nine weeks later, according to the results.

“We found a really good immune response across the board … in fact, higher than the threshold set by Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine two doses,” Matthew Snape, the Oxford professor behind the Com-COV2 trial, told the Reuters news agency on Monday.

The findings supporting flexible dosing will offer some hope to low- and middle-income countries that may need to mix vaccines for first and second doses if supplies run low or become unstable.

“I think the data from this study will be especially interesting and valuable to low- and middle-income countries where they’re still rolling out the first two doses of vaccines,” Snape said.

“We’re showing … you don’t have to stick rigidly to receiving the same vaccine for a second dose … and that if the programme will be delivered more quickly by using multiple vaccines, then it is OK to do so.”

If the AstraZeneca-Oxford vaccine is followed by a Moderna or Novavax shot, higher antibodies and T-cell responses were induced versus two doses of AstraZeneca-Oxford, according to researchers at the University of Oxford.

The study of 1,070 volunteers also found that a dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine followed by a Moderna shot was better than two doses of Pfizer-BioNTech.

Pfizer-BioNTech followed by Novavax induced higher antibodies than the two-dose Oxford-AstraZeneca schedule, although this schedule induced lower antibody and T-cell responses than the two-dose Pfizer-BioNTech schedule.

No safety concerns were raised, according to the Oxford University study published in the Lancet medical journal.

Many countries have been deploying a mix-and-match approach well before robust data was available as they were faced with soaring infection numbers, low supplies and slow immunisation over some safety concerns.

The longevity of protection offered by vaccines has been under scrutiny, with booster doses being considered as well amid surging cases. The discovery of new variants, including Delta and Omicron, has increased the pressure to speed up vaccination campaigns.

Blood samples from participants were tested against the Wild-Type, Beta and Delta variants, researchers of the Com-COV2 study said, adding that vaccines’ efficacy against the variants had waned, but this was consistent across mixed courses.

Deploying vaccines using different technology – like Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna’s mRNA, AstraZeneca’s viral vector and Novavax’s protein-based shot – within the same schedule is a relatively new approach.

The results may inform new approaches to immunisation against other diseases, Snape said.

The study also found that a first dose of the AstraZeneca-Oxford vaccine followed by any of the other candidates in the study generated a particularly robust response, consistent with findings in June.

The study was designed as a so-called “non-inferiority” study – the intent is to demonstrate that mixing is not substantially worse than the standard schedules – and compares the immune system responses to the gold-standard responses reported in previous clinical trials of each vaccine.

Separately on Monday, the World Health Organization advised against using the blood plasma of patients who have recovered from COVID-19 to treat those who are ill, saying current evidence shows it neither improves survival nor reduces the need for ventilators.

The method is also costly and time-consuming to administer, the WHO said in a statement.

The hypothesis for using plasma is that the antibodies it contains could stop the novel coronavirus from replicating and halt tissue damage. Several studies testing convalescent blood plasma have shown no apparent benefit for treating COVID-19 patients who are severely ill.

Source: Reuters