Iraqi militia factions expected the usual cash handout when the new head of Iran’s Quds Force made his first visit to Baghdad earlier this year, succeeding the slain General Qassem Soleimani.
Instead, to their disappointment, Esmail Ghaani brought them silver rings.
For his second visit, Ghaani had to apply for a visa, something unheard of in Soleimani’s time – a bold step by Baghdad’s new government effectively curtailing Iran’s freedom of movement inside Iraq.
The episodes, relayed by several Iraqi officials, illustrate Iran’s struggles to maintain sway over Iraqi armed groups six months after the United States assassinated Soleimani and top militia leader Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis in a drone strike.
Iran at the same time is grappling with the economic fallout from US sanctions and the coronavirus outbreak.
Without imposing figures such as Soleimani and al-Muhandis to unify disparate factions, divisions have emerged in the Popular Mobilisation Forces (PMF), the umbrella group of mainly Shia fighters.
Their deaths also disrupted a trajectory to institutionalise the armed groups, which al-Muhandis had been meticulously planning with Soleimani’s blessing.
“With al-Muhandis gone, there is an absence of an anchor around which [PMF] politics revolves,” said Fanar Haddad, an Iraq researcher.
Reduced funds and clout
Among Iraq’s Shia political and militia factions, Soleimani, a chief architect of Iran’s proxy groups across the region, held almost legendary status.
Charismatic and a fluent Arabic speaker, his rapport with Iraqi officials was unmatched. He slipped in and out of Iraq regularly to plan, mediate and give cash assistance. One surprise visit by him was sufficient to broker agreement between rival factions, officials said.
Since his death, Shia groups have shown discord, arguing over a prime ministerial candidate twice before they settled on Mustafa al-Kadhimi.
Soleimani’s successor as Quds Force commander, Ghaani, is less familiar with Iraqi militia leaders and speaks to them through an interpreter. Meetings in Iraq have increasingly been handled by Iranian Ambassador Iraj Masjedi, himself a former Quds Force member.
Ghaani’s gift of silver rings – symbolically important in Shia Islam – rather than cash came during a meeting in April with leaders of several militia factions, according to three officials. They spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorised to talk to the press.
Ghaani told them, for the moment, they would have to rely on Iraqi state funding, the officials said, a sign of Iran’s economic crisis.
PMF fighters are paid primarily through the state – $2bn in the 2019 budget – but the funds are not dispersed equally. Smaller Iranian-backed groups rely on other informal means of revenue and receive extras from Iran, roughly $3m-$9m, two Iraqi officials close to the militias said.
The PMF was created in 2014 as a framework to organise and pay the thousands who volunteered to fight the armed group ISIL (ISIS) after a fatwa by Iraq’s top cleric Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani. Since then, its political and military might has soared. Under the staunchly pro-Iranian al-Muhandis, it became a channel for Tehran’s influence.
His death opened the door for factions opposed to that influence – particularly ones associated with al-Sistani – to break from the PMF leadership. Militias complain that Iran-friendly groups receive preferential treatment.
The man seen as al-Muhandis’s likely successor, Abdulaziz al-Mohammadawi, known as Abu Fadak, met opposition from factions who saw him as the Iranian-backed choice. He has not been officially recognised by the prime minister, though he has assumed some administrative duties, according to officials.
Some of the most Iran-friendly militias under the PMF have shown signs of splintering.
Attacks against US forces in March were claimed by a purported new group, Usbat al-Thairen, believed to have emerged from the powerful Kataib Hezbollah, which the US accused in previous attacks.
Recently, four militias affiliated with the shrines connected to al-Sistani said they would take orders directly from Iraq’s prime minister, bypassing the PMF leadership.
A senior official from Kataib Hezbollah said the move has weakened the PMF and its legitimacy among the public. For many Iraqis, the group’s credibility is derived from al-Sistani’s fatwa.
The fissure was plain to see when, weeks into his leadership, al-Kadhimi visited the PMF headquarters. To his right sat figures friendly with Tehran, to his left those affiliated with al-Sistani.
It marks a “major wrench” by the Shia establishment led by al-Sistani into Iran’s broader plans, said Randa Slim, director of the Conflict Resolution and Track II Dialogues programme at the Middle East Institute.
“They are basically saying we do not want an organ that takes its orders from Iran,” she said.
A larger question looms over the future of the PMF.
Al-Muhandis had been directing plans to transform a band of independent militias into a more professional force. Those plans remain unfinished, said three militia commanders on a recent visit to Mosul.
Under al-Muhandis, the PMF began referring to its units by brigade numbers rather than faction names and made moves towards imposing military rank structures and disciplinary courts. He oversaw the creation of engineering units providing services such as roadworks.
He held immense influence over militias and their supporters.
When protesters attacked the US Embassy in Baghdad on December 31 in response to American strikes on Kataib Hezbollah targets, it was al-Muhandis and not Iraqi security forces who was ultimately called upon to have them pull back, according to two Iraqi officials.
“Hajj Abu Mahdi made us an official group, it’s the most important thing he did,” said Mohammed al-Mousawi, a PMF commander.
For the years ahead, he had planned greater training for fighters, academies and recruitment to improve management, al-Mousawi said.
Iran appears to be taking a back foot in Iraq. But, experts said, this is likely to be short-lived.
“Iran has proved that it learns and evolves,” said Slim. “Now it’s in the learning phase.”