Sheikh Mohammed said dispute should be resolved by dialogue and respect of sovereignty.
Efforts to end a three-and-a-half-year long blockade on Qatar seem to have been stepped up.
In June 2017, the blockading countries – Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Bahrain and Egypt – accused Qatar, among other things, of supporting terrorism and being too close to Iran, and severed economic and diplomatic ties.
A blockade was also imposed by the four countries by land, sea and air.
Qatar has repeatedly denied the allegations and said there was “no legitimate justification” for the severance of relations.
The blockading quartet issued a list of 13 demands, including the closure of the Al Jazeera Media Network as well as a Turkish military base, which Qatar promptly rejected.
In the last two months, negotiations over finding a resolution have taken place, with Qatar stressing that political dialogue is the only way to end the blockade.
Earlier this month, Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan said a resolution was in sight, with the four governments behind the blockade “on board” and a final agreement expected soon.
Egypt and the UAE have since given their public support to the negotiations, although diplomatic sources said the UAE has been reluctant to compromise.
Ahead of the Gulf Corporation Council (GCC) summit in Riyadh on January 5, Al Jazeera looks back at moves by the blockading countries to undermine Qatar during the blockade.
According to a lawsuit Qatar filed in London and New York in 2019, it said three banks – the UAE’s First Abu Dhabi Bank, Saudi Arabia’s Samba Bank and Luxembourg-based Banque Havilland – sought to sow economic instability by undermining confidence in Qatar’s currency and bonds.
The scheme that most recently came to light has been the role Banque Havilland played, as reported by Bloomberg News.
The report said that in 2017, the bank offered a proposal to allegedly destabilise Qatar’s economy on behalf of one of its largest clients, Mohammed bin Zayed, the crown prince of Abu Dhabi and de facto ruler of the UAE.
The presentation, which was sent to the UAE ambassador to the United States, called for a coordinated attack to deplete Qatar’s foreign-exchange reserves.
In a statement announcing the lawsuit, Qatar claimed the banks had tried to weaken the Qatari riyal by “submitting fraudulent quotes to foreign exchange platforms based in New York, to manipulate New York-based indices, and disrupt financial markets in New York, where significant Qatari assets are held and many investors in Qatar are located”.
As a result, Qatar spent billions shoring up its currency peg and economy, and “while the financial market manipulation failed in its efforts to undermine confidence in the Qatari riyal and Qatar, it nonetheless caused economic losses”, the government said.
According to a report from the International Monetary Fund released earlier this month, Qatar is expected to grow its GDP by 2.5 percent in 2021, the second-highest rate in the GCC.
Weeks before the blockade was imposed, Qatar’s state media agency was hacked and false stories attributed to the Emir Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani were published on its website.
Qatar’s interior ministry said the cyberattacks originated from the UAE and had “state resources” behind it.
Concentrated cyberattacks on Qatar also came via Twitter bots, spreading and amplifying fake news, as well as manipulating hashtags.
According to Marc Owen Jones, assistant professor of Middle East studies and digital humanities at Hamad bin Khalifa University in Qatar, these Twitter bots “create propaganda messages that can distort the reality of the discussions going on in the world” and that Arabic-language Twitter bots have been instrumental in promoting government narratives.
This year, at least 36 Al Jazeera journalists were targeted by advanced spyware sold by an Israeli firm in an attack linked to the governments of Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, cybersecurity watchdog Citizen Lab said.
“They have used some of the content they stole from the phones to blackmail journalists, by posting private photos on the internet,” Al Jazeera’s Tamer Almisshal, who was one of the journalists hacked, said.
Shortly after the blockade was imposed, all channels of the Qatar-based BeIN Sports – which holds exclusive regional rights to broadcast international tournaments and matches – were banned in the blockading countries.
Before long, a 10-channel piracy entity called beoutQ began broadcasting on the Arabsat satellite operator.
BeIN Media Group has long claimed beoutQ is stealing its signal and broadcasting it as its own.
An Al Jazeera investigation last year revealed two Saudi service providers, Selevision and Shammas, were involved in operations carried out by beoutQ.
The World Trade Organization investigated the extensive piracy carried out through the beoutQ, and found it has been “using broadcast transmission without permission from beIN and broadcasting around Saudi Arabia”.
Numerous reports by the UN, as well as human rights groups, show that the blockade has resulted in families being forcibly separated in cases where members hold different citizenship.
The blockading countries ordered their citizens to return home in June 2017, and Qatari nationals living in these countries were given 14 days to leave, splitting up families with members holding different citizenships, Amnesty International documented.
Later, limited travel was allowed from Qatar to Saudi Arabia, Bahrain or the UAE for family members with a “laissez-passer” document detailing the humanitarian reason for the visit, but many people remained unsure how to secure the document.
In June 2020, the UN’s top court backed Qatar against appeals made by the blockading countries against a decision by the world civil aviation body in favour of Qatar over sovereign airspace.
Qatar accused its neighbours of violating a convention that regulates free passage of its passenger planes through foreign airspace.
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) rejected appeals made by Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Bahrain and Egypt, which questioned the authority of the International Civil Aviation Authority (ICAO) – the body that was tasked with hearing Qatar’s complaint.
The ICJ ruling maintained the ICAO has jurisdiction in the case.
Since the start of the blockade, Qatar maintained the four blockading countries acted illegally and in violation of international law.