Court sides with Trump in ‘sanctuary cities’ grant fight

Court says Trump can withhold law enforcement grants to force states to cooperate with immigration authorities.

Protesters holding up signs outside a court in San Francisco after a federal appeals court gave the Trump administration a rare legal win in its efforts to crack down on sanctuary cities [File: Haven Daley/ AP Photo]
Protesters holding up signs outside a court in San Francisco after a federal appeals court gave the Trump administration a rare legal win in its efforts to crack down on sanctuary cities [File: Haven Daley/ AP Photo]

The Trump administration can withhold millions of dollars in law enforcement grants to force states to cooperate with US immigration enforcement, a federal appeals court in New York ruled Wednesday in a decision that conflicted with three other federal appeals courts.

The decision by the 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan overturned a lower court’s decision ordering the administration to release funding to New York City and seven states – New York, Connecticut, New Jersey, Washington, Massachusetts, Virginia and Rhode Island.

The states and city sued the United States government after the Justice Department announced in 2017 that it would withhold grant money from cities and states until they gave federal immigration authorities access to jails and provide advance notice when an undocumented individual was about to be released.

Before the change, cities and states seeking grant money were required only to show they were not preventing local law enforcement from communicating with federal authorities about the immigration status of people who were detained.

At the time, then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions said: “So-called ‘sanctuary’ policies make all of us less safe because they intentionally undermine our laws and protect illegal aliens who have committed crimes.”

The 2nd Circuit said the plain language of relevant laws make clear that the US attorney general can impose conditions on states and municipalities receiving money.

And it noted that the US Supreme Court has repeatedly observed that the federal government maintains broad power over states when it comes to immigration policies.

In the past two years, federal appeals courts in Chicago, Philadelphia and San Francisco have ruled against the federal government by upholding lower-court injunctions placed on the enforcement of some or all of the challenged conditions.

The appeals rulings pertain to the issuance of the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program.

Created in 2006, it is the vehicle through which Congress annually dispenses over $250m in federal funding for state and local criminal justice efforts.

The Byrne Program was named for New York City Police Officer Edward Byrne, who at age 22 was shot dead while guarding the home of a Guyanese immigrant cooperating with authorities investigating drug trafficking.

Source : AP

More from News
Most Read