Trump says ‘tiny’ contingent of 200 US troops to remain in Syria

The US president denies the decision to leave small ‘peacekeeping group’ amounts to a U-turn on troop withdrawal pledge.

Trump in December ordered the withdrawal of the 2,000 troops from Syria [File: Hussein Malla/AP]

US President Donald Trump has denied his administration’s decision to leave about 200 troops in Syria amounts to a policy U-turn, insisting he is “not reversing course” on his pledge to withdraw all US forces from the war-torn country.

Addressing reporters at the White House on Friday, Trump said the contingent set to remain in Syria was a “very small tiny fraction” of the more than 2,000 US forces currently fighting the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant group (ISIL, also known as ISIS) there.

Trump’s announcement followed an earlier statement by the White House confirming the decision to keep a military presence of about 200 soldiers in Syria for an as of yet unspecified duration.

“A small peacekeeping group of about 200 will remain in Syria for a period of time,” White House spokesperson Sarah Sanders said in a statement on Thursday.

The White House statement came amid fierce criticism of Trump’s decision in December to withdraw the 2,000 US soldiers fighting the ISIL in Syria, with members of his own Republican Party blasting the move.  

Critics have decried a number of possible outcomes from a precipitous withdrawal, including a Turkish attack on Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces, Washington’s main ally in the fight against ISIL, as well as a resurgence of the armed group.

US-Turkey coordination


Trump’s decision to keep US troops in Syria was announced after the US leader spoke by phone to Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan.

A White House statement said the two leaders agreed, regarding Syria, to “continue coordinating on the creation of a potential safe zone”.

Turkey wants to set up a safe zone with logistical support from allies and says it should be cleared of the US-backed Kurdish YPG militia, which Ankara considers a “terrorist” group tied to the outlawed Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) inside its own borders. 

David Des Roches, associate professor at the Near East South Asia Center for Security Studies, told Al Jazeera the US decision was a “political” gesture. 

“It’s not a large number of forces. It’s too small to be militarily significant. So it has to be political,” the former Pentagon official said from the city of Bethesda, near the US capital, Washington. 

The US troops’ task will be to keep the peace between Turkey and Kurdish forces, he said. 

“There’s two possible messages here. One is to the Turks, yes, we are serious about protecting your interests and we are willing to keep our forces here to restrain the Kurdish elements of the Syrian Democratic Forces, from allying themselves with the PKK and attacking Turkey. 

“And the second message is to the YPG that you are not going to be abandoned, we will have a presence on the ground to restrain the Turks from attacking you. So in practice, it looks like these guys will be there as hostages to both sides to keep them on their best behaviour.”

A senior US administration official said Trump’s decision had been in the works for some time. It was unclear how long the 200 troops would be expected to remain in the area or where exactly they would be deployed.

Leaving even a small group of US troops in Syria could pave the way for European allies to commit hundreds of troops to help set up and observe a potential safe zone in northeast Syria.


“This is a clear direction to our allies and coalition members that we will be on the ground in some capacity,” the senior administration official told Reuters news agency.

On Thursday, acting Pentagon chief Patrick Shanahan met his counterpart from Belgium. Before the meeting, Didier Reynders, Belgium’s minister of defence, was asked whether he would be open to keeping troops if there were no American forces left.

“We are waiting for preparation of the withdrawal of US troops and we are waiting now for more discussions,” he said.

Until now, European allies have baulked at providing troops unless they received a firm commitment that Washington was still committed to the region.

Source: Al Jazeera, News Agencies