NYT plans to return thousands of ISIL files to Iraq

The New York Times says it plans to digitise more than 15,000 pages of ISIL and make them public.

    NYT plans to return thousands of ISIL files to Iraq
    US soldiers collect documents during a raid conducted at a community centre in Baghdad back in June 2003 [File/AP]

    The New York Times plans to return thousands of documents its journalists "recovered" from Iraq

    The newspaper, which came under fire for removing the documents from the country, also said it would digitise the files and make them available to the public.

    According to a statement on Thursday, NYT correspondent Rukmini Callimachi, who has been covering the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL, also known as ISIS), noted that the newspaper is "seeking a partner to digitize" the documents and make them publicly available online. 

    The database would include at least 15,000 pages of documents Callimachi and her team obtained after ISIL's defeat in Iraq. 

    The NYT also said it would return the original documents to the Iraqi government via its embassy in Washington, DC.

    The announcement follows backlash by academics and scholars who accused Callimachi and the newspaper of illegal and unethical practices after publishing an article called The ISIS files last month.

    Callimachi, who was embedded with Iraqi military units, described in the published article how the documents were "recovered" with the Iraqi army's assistance.

    "On five trips to battle-scarred Iraq, journalists for The New York Times scoured old Islamic State offices, gathering thousands of files abandoned by the militants as their 'caliphate' crumbled," the article read.

    In Thursday's statement, Callimachi, said that: "The Iraqi security forces agreed to help The New York Times collect and preserve the documents." 

    Among the first to condemn the NYT for the recovering of the files from their place of origin was Sinan Antoon, an Iraqi writer and scholar, who in a Twitter post said the move reflected a "long history" of items being transferred overseas. 

    Antoon argued the documents should not have left Iraq, pointing out that the move represented a violation of the 1907 Hague Convention.

    Following the US invasion of Iraq in 2003, millions of documents were shipped out of the country, which remain in the custody of US organisations.

    Other social media users wondered how the documents would be preserved as evidence, while some questioned how the privacy of individuals mentioned in the records would be upheld.

    Despite widespread condemnation, the NYT correspondent argues that the goal was to shed light on the group and make the records available "both to Iraqis and to the world".

    SOURCE: Al Jazeera News


    YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

    Interactive: How does your country vote at the UN?

    Interactive: How does your country vote at the UN?

    We visualised 1.2 million votes at the UN since 1946. What do you think are the biggest issues facing the world today?

    'We were forced out by the government soldiers'

    'We were forced out by the government soldiers'

    We dialled more than 35,000 random phone numbers to paint an accurate picture of displacement across South Sudan.

    Interactive: Plundering Cambodia's forests

    Interactive: Plundering Cambodia's forests

    Meet the man on a mission to take down Cambodia's timber tycoons and expose a rampant illegal cross-border trade.