Sri Lanka leader to shield general from war crimes case

President says he will not allow 'anyone in the world' to touch Jagath Jayasuriya after rights groups sue ex-army chief.

    Sri Lanka leader to shield general from war crimes case
    The lawsuits are based on Jayasuriya's role as a commander in the war's final phase [File: Reuters]

    Sri Lanka's president has vowed to protect a former army chief accused of crimes committed in the bloody final phase of the country's civil war.

    "I state very clearly that I will not allow anyone in the world to touch Jagath Jayasuriya or any other military chief or any war hero in this country," President Maithripala Sirisena said on Sunday, addressing a convention of his Sri Lanka Freedom Party.

    Sirisena's statement came a week after rights groups filed criminal lawsuits in South America against Jayasuriya, who until last week served as the country's envoy to Brazil, Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Peru and Suriname.

    Sri Lanka seeks more time for war crimes probe

    The lawsuits are based on Jayasuriya's role as a commander in the final phase of Sri Lanka's civil war in 2009.

    They allege he oversaw military units that attacked hospitals and killed, disappeared and tortured thousands of people.

    The suits had been filed in Brazil and Colombia, and more were to come in Argentina, Chile and Peru. Suriname had refused to accept the petition.

    Sri Lanka's military has also denied the allegations against Jayasuriya.

    Sirisena's comments are seen as an attempt to woo majority ethnic Sinhalese, most of whom oppose action against military personnel accused of crimes in the fight against minority Tamil rebels.

    Sirisena is being painted as anti-Sinhalese by hard-line sections of the community.

    More than 100,000 people are believed to have been killed in Sri Lanka's 26-year civil war, including 40,000 to 70,000 in the final phase alone.

    In a joint resolution in 2015 at the UN Human Rights Council, Sri Lanka promised, among other things, a truth-seeking mechanism, a judicial mechanism to prosecute those accused of human rights abuses and a new constitution that covers the island nation's varied ethnicities and religions.

    However, little progress has been made.

    READ MORE: UN condemns Sri Lanka over war probe

    Sri Lanka had agreed to allow foreign judges, but backtracked later, insisting that only local courts could investigate the allegations.

    Sri Lankan task force rules out war crime pardon

    The criminal suits, reviewed by the AP news agency, were spearheaded by the human rights group International Truth and Justice Project, an evidence-gathering organisation based in South Africa.

    They had three central aims: push local authorities to open investigations of Jayasuriya, remove his diplomatic immunity and expel him.

    However, Jayasuriya left Brazil last week to return to Sri Lanka after completing his two-year tour of service.

    The petitions can be amended to ask for arrest warrants in case he returns, according to the lawyer who filed the suit.

    The civil war in Sri Lanka, an island off the southern tip of India, raged intermittently between 1983 and 2009.

    Fueled in part by ethnic tensions between ethnic majority Sinhalese and minority Tamils, the fight against the government was led by a group called the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam.

    They fought to establish a separate Tamil state in the northeastern part of the island.

    Talk to Al Jazeera: Sri Lankan president - No allegations of war crimes

    SOURCE: AP news agency


    How Moscow lost Riyadh in 1938

    How Moscow lost Riyadh in 1938

    Russian-Saudi relations could be very different today, if Stalin hadn't killed the Soviet ambassador to Saudi Arabia.

    Interactive: Coding like a girl

    Interactive: Coding like a girl

    What obstacles do young women in technology have to overcome to achieve their dreams? Play this retro game to find out.

    The War in October: What Happened in 1973?

    The War in October: What Happened in 1973?

    Al Jazeera examines three weeks of war from which both Arabs and Israelis claimed to emerge victorious.