Dylann Roof found guilty of Charleston church slaughter

Dylann Roof could now face death penalty after jury finds him guilty of killing nine black churchgoers in Charleston.

Dylann roof
A handout photograph posted to a website with a racist manifesto appears to show Dylann Roof [File:Reuters]

Dylann Roof, the white supremacist who shot dead nine African-American parishioners at a historic church in Charleston last year, could now face the death penalty after being found guilty of all charges.

A federal jury in the southern US port city needed only two hours on Thursday to find Roof, 22, guilty on 33 counts, including hate crimes resulting in death.

Former white supremacist reflects on church shooting

The attack on a Bible study group at the church, known to most as “Mother Emanuel”, shocked the nation and exposed the deep divides in the US over race and access to guns.

“He executed them because he believed they were nothing more than animals,” federal prosecutor Nathan Williams said during his closing argument. “His actions in the church are the best reflections of the vastness of his hatred.”

The guilty verdict sends the trial into the penalty phase, which begins on January 3. Roof, who did not testify during the trial, has chosen to represent himself despite the prosecutors’ vow to seek a death sentence.

The defendant showed no emotion and traced his fingers on the table in front of him as the 33 guilty verdicts were read out, the AFP news agency reported.

In a videotaped confession shown in court last week, Roof calmly told FBI agents that he carried out the June 17, 2015, attack at the Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal church in retaliation for what he said were crimes committed by blacks against whites.

No remorse

Roof chuckled during his confession, saying he had not gone to another church “because there could be white people there”.

He said he became inspired after reading about a Florida neighbourhood watchman’s 2012 killing of unarmed black teenager Trayvon Martin, a case that sparked widespread protests.

“After I read that, I typed in – for some reason I typed in black on white crime,” Roof said. “I had to do it, because somebody had to do something because black people are killing white people every day.”

Three people survived the shooting spree. None of the survivors or family members of victims spoke to reporters after the trial concluded.

READ MORE: Is Dylann Roof a loner or a white supremacist?

Defence lawyer David Bruck hinted at mental illness in his closing argument, saying Roof had not grown up in a family with racist beliefs, had no escape plan or money and had not communicated with white supremacists.

The racist beliefs were “downloaded directly from the internet into his brain … Everything he’s doing is just an imitation,” Bruck said.

FBI agent Joseph Hamski testified on Tuesday that Roof had travelled a half-dozen times to the church in the months before the shooting.

Roof documented the trips with photographs in which he posed in front of historic sites linked to the US South during times of slavery, sometimes wearing a jacket with the flags of apartheid-era South Africa and Rhodesia, now Zimbabwe.

Many of the images were posted in a hate-filled online manifesto that included racist language directed at African Americans and other minorities.


The trial featured heart-rending testimony from survivors of the shooting at the church – the oldest African Methodist Episcopal church in the southern US, dating back to the late 1700s when a handful of slaves gathered to worship with free African Americans.

One survivor had lain in a pool of her son’s and her aunt’s blood, cradling her granddaughter as the massacre unfolded. The young girl also lived.

Felicia Sanders called Roof “evil” and said “there’s no place on Earth for him except the pit of hell.”

Roof’s mother had a heart attack during the emotional testimony and had to be treated in hospital.

Roof’s lawyers called no witnesses, resting their case after failing to persuade the judge to allow two mental health experts to give evidence on behalf of the defendant.

After the jury was dismissed, Roof calmly told Judge Richard Gergel that he still wishes to represent himself during the sentencing phase.

Gergel cautioned against that, telling the young man that his lawyers “zealously defended you”.

“It’s important to appreciate the gravity of the situation,” he said.

Other charges against Roof included: hate crimes resulting in an attempt to kill; obstruction of exercise of religion resulting in death or an attempt to kill; and assorted firearms charges with the intent to commit murder or a violent crime.

Roof is also facing state murder charges in South Carolina, though that trial is not due to begin until January 17. State prosecutors also are seeking the death penalty.

Source: AFP