WHO: No proof drinking coffee causes cancer

Your latte or cappuccino will not cause cancer, as long as it is not served too hot, new research says.

    WHO: No proof drinking coffee causes cancer
    While drinking coffee may not cause cancer, sipping beverages that are too hot just might [Jorge Silva/Reuters]

    Fast Facts

    • WHO downgrades classification of drinking coffee as possible cause of cancer
    • At the same time, cancer research agency says drinking extremely hot liquid could cause the disease
    • Tea in countries including China and Iran is served at high temperatures

    The World Health Organization's research arm has downgraded its classification of coffee as a possible carcinogen, declaring there isn't enough proof to show a link to cancer.

    But the International Agency for Research on Cancer, or IARC, also announced in a report published on Wednesday that said drinking "very hot" beverages of any kind could potentially raise the cancer risk, and it classified them as "probably carcinogenic" to humans.

    In particular, it cited countries including China, Iran and those in South America, where teas such as the bitter herbal infusion mate are traditionally drunk at extremely high temperatures.

    In contrast to cafes in North America and Europe, infusion teas are often served considerably hotter, at above 65 or 70 degrees Celsius.

    Experts convened by the Lyons-based IARC concluded that there was inadequate evidence to suggest coffee might cause cancer, according to a letter published in The Lancet Oncology.

    Beware of hot drinks

    "I'm not really sure why coffee was in a higher category in the first place," said Owen Yang, an epidemiologist at the University of Oxford who has previously studied the possible link between coffee and cancer.

    He was not part of the IARC expert group. "The best evidence available suggests that coffee does not raise the cancer risk," he said.

    READ MORE: Change is brewing as Chinese switch to coffee

    Drinking very hot beverages, however, just might.

    Dana Loomis, deputy head of the IARC programme which classifies carcinogens, said they began to look into a possible link after seeing unusually high rates of esophageal cancer in countries where drinking very hot beverages is common.

    He said that even at temperatures below 60 degrees Celsius, hot beverages can scald the skin, and that consuming drinks at even higher temperatures could be harmful.

    Loomis said very hot beverages might cause a "thermal injury" in the throat that could eventually promote the growth of tumours, but that evidence was limited. He said there wasn't enough evidence to suggest that eating very hot food might also be risky.

    Other experts said that people should remain focused on the leading causes of cancers, including that of the esophagus, and that there were more important changes they could make other than waiting for their drinks to cool.

    "Quitting smoking and reducing alcohol consumption are much more significant for reducing cancer risk than the temperature of what you're drinking," said Dr Otis Brawley, chief medical officer of the American Cancer Society.

    Brawley said that the cancer risk posed by drinking hot beverages was similar to that posed by eating pickled vegetables.

    Still, he welcomed the news that coffee would no longer be deemed a possible carcinogen.

    "As a heavy coffee drinker, I have always enjoyed my coffee guilt-free," he said. "But now there is scientific evidence to justify that."

    SOURCE: Agencies


    Cricket World Cup 2019 Quiz: How many runs can you score?

    Cricket World Cup 2019 Quiz: How many runs can you score?

    Pick your team and answer as many correct questions in three minutes.

    Visualising every Saudi coalition air raid on Yemen

    Visualising every Saudi coalition air raid on Yemen

    Since March 2015, Saudi Arabia and a coalition of Arab states have launched more than 19,278 air raids across Yemen.

    Why did Bush go to war in Iraq?

    Why did Bush go to war in Iraq?

    No, it wasn't because of WMDs, democracy or Iraqi oil. The real reason is much more sinister than that.