Rights groups slam Nepal deal on war crimes amnesty

Human rights groups accuse ruling coalition, including Maoists, of attempting to "wash away the crimes of the conflict".

    Rights groups slam Nepal deal on war crimes amnesty
    Gayaram Chaudhary was tortured by the Nepali army, he suffers from neurological problems [Prabhat R Jha/Al Jazeera]

    Rights groups have slammed a deal between Nepal's ruling parties to withdraw civil war cases from courts and offer amnesty to people accused of abuses during a decade-long Maoist rebellion.

    Security forces and former Maoist rebels have been accused of carrying out torture, killings, rapes and "forced disappearances" during the conflict, which ended in 2006 leaving more than 16,000 dead.

    The ruling Communist Party (Unified Marxist Leninist) of Nepal and its coalition partner, the Unified Communist Party of Nepal (Maoists), last week signed an agreement paving the way for war crimes cases to be withdrawn or pardoned.

    In a joint statement, Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch and the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) accused the two parties of attempting to "wash away the crimes of the conflict" with the new agreement.


    IN PICTURES: What became of 1,400 people who disappeared in Nepal?


    "It flies in the face of Nepal's international human rights obligations and the rulings of its own Supreme Court by trying to wash away the crimes of the conflict... and provide blanket amnesty to alleged perpetrators," said Sam Zarifi, ICJ's Asia-Pacific director.

    Nepal's Supreme Court has repeatedly opposed attempts to grant amnesty for serious rights abuses.

    The Himalayan nation set up two post-war commissions for transitional justice in 2015, which began to accept complaints from victims last month.

    Activists accused the security forces of threatening witnesses, who have not been provided adequate safety and protection.

    The Truth and Reconciliation Commission and Commission for Enforced Disappearances were agreed as part of the peace pact signed between the Maoists and the government in 2006.

    Although the Supreme Court has issued arrest warrants in several cases of alleged war crimes, only one verdict has been given, with five former Maoist rebels convicted in 2014 of the murder of a journalist.

    An army colonel, who was arrested in January 2013 in Britain over allegations of torture committed during the war, is also facing trial in a British court.

    SOURCE: AFP


    YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

    How different voting systems work around the world

    How different voting systems work around the world

    Nearly two billion voters in 52 countries around the world will head to the polls this year to elect their leaders.

    How Moscow lost Riyadh in 1938

    How Moscow lost Riyadh in 1938

    Russian-Saudi relations could be very different today, if Stalin hadn't killed the Soviet ambassador to Saudi Arabia.

    Will you push the boundaries or play it safe?

    Will you push the boundaries or play it safe?

    Curate an art exhibition and survive Thailand's censorship crackdown in this interactive game.