Cautious UN welcome for South Sudan peace deal

Security Council says it remains ready to impose arms embargo if agreement aimed at ending 20-month war collapses.

The UN Security Council has welcomed the signing of a peace agreement aimed at ending South Sudan’s civil war while warning that it remains ready to impose an arms embargo on the country if the deal collapses.

The 15-nation council’s statement comes as South Sudan rebels and the army accuse each other of attacks that appear to undermine the fragile peace deal that President Salva Kiir reluctantly signed just days after the rebel side accepted it.

Exclusive: Riek Machar discusses South Sudan peace deal

“The Security Council acknowledges that this agreement is the first step in reversing the difficult political and economic situation, and humanitarian and security catastrophe resulting from this crisis,” the council said on Friday.

The council said it “calls upon the parties … to fully implement the agreement”.

The statement included a threat to anyone undermining the agreement.

It spoke of the council’s “readiness to consider appropriate measures … including through the imposition of an arms embargo and additional targeted sanctions.”

Security Council diplomats say they are prepared to move on a US-drafted resolution that would implement an arms embargo if the peace deal falls apart.

It could also add additional individuals to a UN blacklist.

South Sudan plunged into civil war in December 2013 when a political crisis prompted fighting between forces loyal to Kiir and rebels allied with his former deputy, Riek Machar.

undefined

The 20-month conflict reopened ethnic fault lines that pit Kiir’s Dinka against Machar’s ethnic Nuer forces.

Kiir, who has led South Sudan since it seceded from Sudan in 2011, last week asked for more time for consultations but was given a two-week deadline to sign or risk UN sanctions.

He ended up signing the deal in the capital Juba on Wednesday but noted that he had reservations. Machar had signed it first.

Al Jazeera’s Anna Cavell, reporting from Juba earlier this week, said the sealing of the deal was potentially very important and could change the lives of hundreds of thousands of people affected by the civil war.

“However, some of the top commanders have split from [rebel leader] Machar, and they say the peace deal means nothing to them, so … it does not mean that it would end the fighting,” she said.

Sexual violence in South Sudan

Fighting has killed thousands of people and displaced more than 2.2 million in South Sudan, 500,000 of whom have fled the country since the civil war began.

Many rely on aid to survive.

A report by a UN panel of experts, made public on Tuesday, said both sides in the conflict have targeted civilians.

It also said “the intensity and brutality of the violence” since April has been the worst in an “exceedingly violent conflict”.

The UN said that young girls have been raped and burned alive. 

At the same time, South Sudan’s public debt has climbed from zero at its independence in 2011 to $4.2bn as of June.

The report said the panel had started to investigate “the financing channels used by the government and the opposition to prosecute the war and into those individuals and entities who gain financially from the continuation of the conflict”.

Kiir, who had asked for time to sign the peace deal before doing so on Wednesday, noted that he had reservations [Reuters]
Kiir, who had asked for time to sign the peace deal before doing so on Wednesday, noted that he had reservations [Reuters]
Source: Al Jazeera, News Agencies