Top ISIL leader in Libya killed by US strike: Pentagon

Pentagon also confirms death of senior al-Shabab leader in Somalia in separate air strike.

    Top ISIL leader in Libya killed by US strike: Pentagon
    US air strike carried out by F-15 aircraft killed the leader of ISIL in Libya, Abu Nabil [Anatoliy Lukich/Shutterstock]

    The US has announced it has killed two senior leaders of two separate armed groups in Africa during recent air strikes.

    The Pentagon confirmed on Monday the death of Abu Nabil, the leader of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) in Libya.

    He was targeted in a November 13 US air strike carried out by F-15 aircraft on a compound in the city of Derna.

    At the time, US officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, had expressed confidence that Abu Nabil was killed in the air strike.

    "[Abu] Nabil's death will degrade ISIL's ability to meet the group's objectives in Libya, including recruiting new ISIL members, establishing bases in Libya, and planning external attacks on the United States," Peter Cook, a Pentagon spokesperson said at the time.

    'Significant blow'

    US officials also said that a senior al-Shabab leader was killed in an air strike in Somalia on December 2, in what they are calling a significant blow to the group.

    The US officials named him as Abdirahman Sandhere, also known as "Ukash".

    SOURCE: Agencies


    YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

    Learn what India's parties' symbols mean by drawing them

    Learn what India's parties' symbols mean by drawing them

    More than 2,300 political parties have registered for the largest electoral exercise in the world.

    Visualising every Saudi coalition air raid on Yemen

    Visualising every Saudi coalition air raid on Yemen

    Since March 2015, Saudi Arabia and a coalition of Arab states have launched more than 19,278 air raids across Yemen.

    Why did Bush go to war in Iraq?

    Why did Bush go to war in Iraq?

    No, it wasn't because of WMDs, democracy or Iraqi oil. The real reason is much more sinister than that.