Should denying the 'Armenian Genocide' be a crime?

European Court rules in favour of Turkish politician in case that tests limits on free speech.

    The European Court of Human Rights has upheld its verdict over the case of Turkish politician Dogu Perincek, who said "the Armenian Genocide was a great international lie".

    In 2007, Switzerland convicted Perincek of "racial discrimination" for his comments.

    But the European Court has now ruled that Switzerland violated Perincek's right to freedom of speech and that it was not necessary to subject him to a "criminal penalty in order to protect the rights of the Armenian community".

    So, does the decision rightfully uphold Europe's commitment to free speech? Or overshadow Armenian grievances?

    And who decides what constitutes a genocide?

    Presenter: Sami Zeidan

    Guests:

    Geoffrey Robertson - a human rights lawyer who represented the Armenian government in this case.

    Richard Falk - a professor emeritus of International Law at Princeton University.

    Arieh Kovler - a freelance writer who wrote an article titled, The Limits to Freedom of Expression.

    SOURCE: Al Jazeera


    YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

    How Moscow lost Riyadh in 1938

    How Moscow lost Riyadh in 1938

    Russian-Saudi relations could be very different today, if Stalin hadn't killed the Soviet ambassador to Saudi Arabia.

    Interactive: Coding like a girl

    Interactive: Coding like a girl

    What obstacles do young women in technology have to overcome to achieve their dreams? Play this retro game to find out.

    The War in October: What Happened in 1973?

    The War in October: What Happened in 1973?

    Al Jazeera examines three weeks of war from which both Arabs and Israelis claimed to emerge victorious.