No death penalty for Colorado theatre massacre gunman

Jury fails to agree on capital punishment, meaning James Holmes will serve life in prison without parole for 12 murders.

    No death penalty for Colorado theatre massacre gunman
    Prosecutors argued Holmes deserved to die because he methodically planned the 2012 assault [File: Reuters]

    United States theatre gunman James Holmes will be sentenced to life in prison without parole after a jury failed to agree on whether he should get the death penalty for his murderous attack on a packed movie premiere in Colorado in 2012.

    The nine women and three men said on Friday that they could not reach a unanimous verdict on each of the murder counts. That automatically eliminates the death penalty for the failed neuroscientist, who blamed his calculated murders of 12 people on mental illness.

    Prosecutors argued Holmes deserved to die because he methodically planned the 2012 assault at a midnight screening of a Batman movie, even blasting techno music through ear phones so he wouldn't hear his victims scream.

    Inside Story: Does the US need stricter gun controls?

    The same jury had rejected his insanity defence, finding Holmes capable of understanding right from wrong when he murdered 12 people and tried to kill 70 others.

    But the defence countered that his schizophrenia led to a psychotic break, and that powerful delusions drove him to carry out one of the nation's deadliest mass shootings.

    There was never any question during the gruelling, four-month trial as to whether Holmes was the killer.

    Holmes surrendered outside the theatre, where police found him clad head-to-toe in combat gear.

    The trial hinged instead on the question of whether a mentally ill person should be held legally and morally culpable for an act of unspeakable violence.

    It took jurors only about 12 hours of deliberations to decide the first part - they rejected his insanity defence and found him guilty of 165 felony counts.

    The defence then conceded his guilt, but insisted during the sentencing phase that his crimes were caused by the psychotic breakdown of a mentally ill young man, reducing his moral culpability and making a life sentence appropriate.

    The jury's final decision came after days of tearful testimony from relatives of the slain.

    SOURCE: AP


    YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

    How different voting systems work around the world

    How different voting systems work around the world

    Nearly two billion voters in 52 countries around the world will head to the polls this year to elect their leaders.

    How Moscow lost Riyadh in 1938

    How Moscow lost Riyadh in 1938

    Russian-Saudi relations could be very different today, if Stalin hadn't killed the Soviet ambassador to Saudi Arabia.

    The peace games: Dreaming big for South Sudan's youth

    The peace games: Dreaming big for South Sudan's youth

    A relatively new independence and fresh waves of conflict inspire a South Sudanese refugee to build antiwar video games.