Dutch ‘hate speech’ case to resume
Court orders the trial of right-wing MP Geert Wilders to go ahead after he complained the judges were biased.
 |
| Wilders faces up to a year in prison or a fine of more than $10,000 for his comments if convicted [AFP] |
An Amsterdam court has ordered the trial of Geert Wilders, a right-wing politician accused of inciting racial hatred, to resume after the MP argued that the judges were biased.
The district court rejected Wilders’ argument on Tuesday, saying there was little evidence to show judges were not impartial.
The one-day delay to the trial occured after the MP’s lawyer took exception to what he perceived as criticism from one of the judges over Wilder’s decision not to answer any questions.
Bram Moszkowicz said the remark showed that Jan Moors, the presiding judge, was biased against his client and moved to have him substituted.
Wilders has been accused of inciting hate against Muslims through his short internet film, Fitna, which denounced the Quran as a fascist book, and in comments made in Dutch newspapers and on Internet forums.
He is facing five counts of giving religious offence to Muslims and inciting hatred and discrimination against Muslims and people of non-Western immigrant origin, particularly Moroccans.
His trial will resume on Wednesday
‘Freedom of expression’
Fitna, released in 2008, urged Muslims to tear out “hate-filled” passages from the Quran and juxtaposes images of the September 11, 2001, attacks on the US with quotations from the text.
Prosecutors have also accused Wilders of making comments comparing Islam to Nazism and calling for a ban on the Muslim holy book.
He risks up to a year in jail or a $10,471 fine for his comments if convicted.
In his opening comments to the court on Monday Wilders repeated his argument that his comments were in the bounds of law due to freedom of speech.
“Formally I’m on trial here today, but with me, the freedom of expression of many, many Dutch people is also being judged,” he said in reference to the 1.4 million supporters who helped vote his party in at third place in June.
However he refused to answer questions put to him by the panel of three judges, leading Moors to comment that Wilders was known for making bold statements but avoiding discussions, adding “it appears you’re doing so again”.
The case comes as Wilder’s Freedom Party is close to seeing many of its policy goals realised, after agreeing to support a right-wing Dutch governmentset to take office this month.
The Christian Democrat (CDA) party voted on Saturday to co-operate with the Freedom party, removing another hurdle to forming a conservative Dutch government.
His political allies have promised to carry out part of his anti-immigration agenda, saying they will turn away more asylum-seekers, and cut immigration from non-Western countries in half by making it difficult for foreign spouses or children to join families that have already immigrated and become Dutch citizens.
However many politicians have raised reservations about working with Wilders.