McChrystal assesses Afghan strategy

US and Nato chief reportedly wants Afghan army and police forces doubled in size.

The US and Nato commander is reviewing how troops operate on the ground in Afghanistan [GALLO/GETTY]
The US and Nato commander is reviewing how troops operate on the ground in Afghanistan [GALLO/GETTY]

The classified review was initiated to examine how to tackle Taliban and al-Qaeda fighters in Afghanistan, and improve the quality of Afghanistan’s security forces, Isaf said.

“The situation in Afghanistan is serious, but success is achievable and demands a revised implementation strategy, commitment and resolve, and increased unity of effort,” McChrystal was quoted as saying.

Deadly month

The move comes after it was disclosed that August was the worst month on record for US fatalities in Afghanistan.

The death of a US soldier in the east of the country last week pushed the death toll for the month to 45, marking August as the deadliest month for US forces in Afghanistan since the 2001 invasion toppled the Taliban government.

Two British soldiers were also killed on Monday by an explosion in Afghanistan’s Helmand province, raising British fatalities in Afghanistan to 210 since hostilities began in 2001.

in depth

  US trapped in ‘bitter war’?
  On the frontlines with US troops
  Interview with chairman of the US joint chiefs of staff

The rise in casualties since Barack Obama, the US president, ordered 21,000 extra troops to Afghanistan is likely to lead to further questioning of the war in the US and among other nations which have contributed to the Nato-led force in the country.

Bays said that it was unlikely that a specific request for further additional international forces had been included in the review.

“What happens is that he [McChrystal] puts in the strategic review and then there is another process – called the ‘troop-to-task’ process – which takes place after this assessment to decide if there should be more American and international troops,” he said.

“I know that one of his plans is to look at the amount of the troops he currently has in the country and work out what all of them are doing.

“I think that the general would like to see more of the troops who are here moved to frontline fighting positions.”

Strategy review

The website, which compiles and publishes statistics of the dead in the conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq, says that 302 foreign troops have been killed in Afghanistan so far this year, up from 294 in the whole of 2008.

Bays said: “We have only reached August, there are still four months to go and yet we’ve surpassed the previous deadliest year – last year.”

At least 302 foreign troops have been killed
in Afghanistan in 2009 [Gallo/Getty]

Bays said McChrystal’s assessment was being handed over to Robert Gates, the US secretary of defence, and Anders Fogh Rasmussen, the Nato secretary-general.    

“He was going to announce this assessment on August 12 before the election, but there was concern that it could become a political issue and also that the security situation could change because of the polls,” he said.

“They are also changing the structure of the command here on the ground – McChrystal will deal with the overall strategy, but another general, David Rodriguez will deal with day-to-day war fighting.

“The other element of the plan that we hear is that Nato will get more involved in the training of the Afghan army and police.

“They are hoping that Nato nations that won’t send more troops to fight might send more troops to train.”

Fierce debate

David Kilcullen, a senior adviser to McChrystal, told journalists in Australia on Sunday that hard fighting in Afghanistan was likely to last another two years and after that the Taliban would hopefully believe it was better to negotiate than continue combat.

That would be followed by a three-year transition to effective Afghan government and five-year overwatch period involving international forces as back-up, he said.

Britain, Canada and the Netherlands are the biggest contributors to the Nato-led effort in Afghanistan, after the United States.

A surge in British casualties as forces attempted to secure areas of the south before the elections, in which turnout was reportedly low, has already sparked debate there about the country’s role in the conflict.

Source: Al Jazeera, News Agencies


More from News
Most Read