Dutch to use full-body scanners

Move affecting flights to US unveiled after preliminary inquiry into failed bomb plot.

The use of body scanners is set to increase airport's costs and the time needed to check passengers [AFP]
The use of body scanners is set to increase airport's costs and the time needed to check passengers [AFP]

Abdulmutallab passed through a security check that included a hand baggage scan and a metal detector, during the lay over in Amsterdam on Friday, Ter Horst said.

For his part, Erik Ackerboom, head of the Dutch counterterrorism bureau, dismissed suggestions that Abdulmutallab should have aroused suspicion when he paid for a round-trip ticket from Lagos to Detroit in cash and had no check-in luggage.

Paying cash in Africa is not unusual, he said, and the lack of a checked suitcase “wasn’t a reason for alarm”.

Privacy issues

Schiphol airport already has 15 body scanners, but privacy concerns have restricted their use and the issue has been previously raised in the European parliament.

Speaking to Al Jazeera, Ter Horst said: “We will use them for American passengers flying to the United States and we do not need the approval of the European parliament.”

In video

Al Jazeera talks to a former CIA agent about the growing threat facing air travel

Nadim Baba, Al Jazeera’s correspondent in The Hague, said: “We’ve been hearing from people in the Netherlands that they are quite willing to undergo that [full-body scanning] to make sure that they’re safe when they travel.

“The Dutch authorities want to widen the use of these full-body scanners that can see through people’s clothes.

“Now there have been objections to that in Europe for privacy reasons, and health reasons, and not so long ago the European parliament actually blocked the introduction of these full-body scanners across Europe.

“They did allow Schiphol airport to introduce them on a reduced basis and they [the Dutch authorities] say that they’ve tweaked the technology now so that a computer, rather than a person, looks at the first image, so the privacy issue is now out of the way they say.”

Correct checks

Abdulmutallab carried 80 grams of the highly explosive PETN onto the Northwestern Airlines flight, and allegedly assembled the device in the aircraft’s toilet.

He is then believed to have attempted to detonate the device with a syringe of chemicals.

Part of the aircraft’s cabin wall was set alight and Abdulmutallab suffered burns, before the situation was brought under control by passengers and crew.

Schiphol airport was said to have carried out the required security checks correctly and US authorities had cleared the passenger list.

The New York Times reported on Wednesday that two US officials, who it did not name, had said that the US government had intelligence from Yemen before Christmas Day that leaders of a branch of al-Qaeda had mentioned that “a Nigerian” was being prepared for a terrorist attack.

“No suspicious matters which would give reason to classify the person involved as a high-risk passenger were identified during the security check,'” Ter Horst said.

She said that full-body wave scanners are able to identify chemicals, unlike metal detectors currently used on passengers.

Expensive change

Speaking to Al Jazeera, Norman Shanks, ex-head of security at the British Airport Authority, said: “Since 9/11 there have been significant increases in airport security.

“The European Community then set common standards for all its states and some others joined those measures, such as Switzerland.

Flight security

In the wake of the 9/11 attacks in New York and Washington, the FBI and other US agencies drew up lists intended to prevent suspected criminals or people labelled terrorists from boarding flights to and within the US.

The “Watch List” comprises 550,000 names of those the US authorities believe have possible ties to terrorism but do not present a specific threat and are allowed to fly.

 The much smaller “No-Fly” list comprises about 4,000 people who the US claims present a known, specific or suspected threat to aviation.

 There is also a secondary “No Fly” list of an additional 14,000, who require additional screening before they can fly.

“These are higher than other nations’ standards.”

Shanks said that trials of body scanners had been held at airports, for example at Schiphol and London’s Heathrow, and that they are quite effective in identifying items under clothing.

“The reason they are not used as a matter of routine is the belief held by many people that it infringes human liberties,” he said.

The use of body scanners, which cost the equivalent of $125,000-$140,000 per unit in the UK compared to $6,500-$9,500, is set to increase the cost of security measures, Shanks said.

It will also require extra space and time to scan passengers.

“I think we will see a growing trend towards observation of passengers to select those who appear not to be acting normally,” Shanks said.

“This has been called profiling, but it is assessing people’s behaviour.”

Source : Al Jazeera, News Agencies


More from News
Most Read