Ban Ki-moon issues new dispatch after acknowledging earlier one favoured Morocco.
However, UN officials said the most likely outcome from the two day meeting at the secluded Greentree Estate in Manhasset, about 40km east of New York City, is agreement on another meeting, or a series of meetings.
Morocco and the Polisario Front agreed to meet after the UN Security Council unanimously adopted a resolution on April 30 urging talks over the region.
The talks are being held under the auspices of Peter Van Walsum, personal envoy for Ban Ki-moon, the UN secretary general, for Western Sahara.
Morocco, whose occupation of the former Spanish colony in 1975 sparked a 16-year war with the Polisario, has insisted that its autonomy plan, unveiled in early April, offers “the only realistic solution”.
|Timeline: Western Sahara|
Late-1975 – Spain withdraws from Western Sahara and Morocco and Mauritania split the territory.
1979 – Mauritania signs peace deal with Polisaria and withdraws from Western Sahara. Morocco occupies the whole territory.
1992 – Referendum postponed because of dispute over who is eligible to vote.
2003 – UN proposes Western Sahara becomes a semi-autonomous region of Morocco for up to five years, to be followed by a referendum. Polisario endorses the plan but Morocco rejects it.
The Polisario Front, an indigenous independence movement backed by Algeria, maintains that its April proposal for a referendum with independence as an option is crucial to achieving self-determination for the people of Western Sahara, and to complete the territory’s decolonisation.
Armed conflict between the Polisario’s 15,000 fighters and Morocco’s US-equipped army ended in 1991 with a UN-negotiated cease-fire that called for a referendum on the region’s future.
But after 15 years and the expenditure of more than $600m, the UN has been unable to resolve the standoff or hold the referendum.
James Baker, former US secretary of state, organised talks on behalf of the UN in 1997 and again in May 2000 to try to salvage plans for an independence referendum, but no progress was made because Morocco and Polisario did not agree on voter lists.
A UN peace plan in 2003, which envisioned temporary autonomy followed by a referendum in which both Saharan and Moroccan settlers would vote, was accepted by Polisario but rejected by Morocco.
Ahmed Boukhari, the Polisario’s UN representative, said on Thursday that if Morocco respects the Security Council resolution and treats the proposals presented by the two parties equally, then “there will be hopes for the peace process engaged in Manhasset, and this round will be positive for that process”.
“However, taking account of the latest statement by Morocco officials, we have no assurance nor hopes that Morocco is going to respect the terms of the resolution, and it is going to threaten the peace process like they destroyed Mr. James Baker’s efforts in 2003.”
At the end of June’s negotiations, Khalihenna Ould Errachid, the chief adviser on Western Sahara to King Mohamed VI of Morocco, said there was a need for compromise and “a renunciation to extremist positions and demands”.
“Morocco has given up total integration and we expect the other party to give up total independence.”
Last month, the US backed Morocco’s offer of regional autonomy but other UN Security Council members said independence must remain an option.
Leading up to this week’s talks, eight human rights and civic groups in Western Sahara signed a petition to Ban saying any solution that did not allow the Saharan people to exercise the right to self-determination would be “undemocratic”.
The letter also complained about a deteriorating human rights situation and alleged abuses by Morocco including abductions, mass murder and torture.