US professor cleared of terror charges

The decision on Tuesday was a setback for the US administration, as the case, built largely on wiretaps and seized documents, was seen as a test of the controversial Patriot Act that gave the authorities wider surveillance powers after the 11 September 2001 attacks in New York and the Pentagon.

Al-Arian, 47, was found not guilty of conspiring to “murder or maim people” outside the United States and of providing material support to the Palestinian resistance movement, Islamic Jihad, which the US has labelled a “terrorist organisation”.

The federal jury acquitted al-Arian of eight charges out of the 17 against him but was deadlocked on the others.

The former University of South Florida computer engineering professor wept after the verdicts, and his attorney, Linda Moreno, hugged him. He will go back to jail until prosecutors decide whether to retry him on the deadlocked charges.

Federal prosecutors said al-Arian and his co-defendants acted as the communications arm of Islamic Jihad, spreading the word and raising money that went towards bombings that have killed hundreds.

He was considered one of the most important “terrorist” figures to be brought to trial in the United States since the 11 September attacks.

The Patriot Act gave sweeping powers to the authorities

His indictment in 2003 was hailed by the then attorney-general John Ashcroft as one of the first triumphs of the Patriot Act.

Co-defendants Sameeh Hammoudeh and Ghassan Zayid Ballut were acquitted of all charges against them.

Another, Hatem Naji Fariz, was found not guilty on 24 counts, and jurors deadlocked on the remaining eight.

The US Justice Department had no immediate comment.

Controversy

The controversial Patriot Act greatly expanded the government’s powers and broke down the wall between foreign intelligence investigations and domestic law enforcement in the al-Arian case, officials said.

It allowed separate FBI investigations – one of them a multi-year secret foreign intelligence probe of the professor’s activities – to be combined and all the evidence used against him.

Al-Arian, a Palestinian who was born in Kuwait, has lived in the United States since 1975.

He was granted permanent-resident status in 1989 but denied US citizenship in 1996. He was fired by the university shortly after he was indicted.

Surveillance

The federal jury deliberated 13 days after hearing from 80 government witnesses and listening to often-plodding testimony about faxes and wiretapped phone calls during a trial that lasted more than five months.

“Any discussion of Sami al-Arian being the most powerful man in the [Islamic Jihad] is fantasy” William Moffit, Al-Arian’s attorney

The government alleged that the defendants were part of a Tampa group that took the lead in determining the structure and goals of Islamic Jihad, which the US State Department has listed as a terrorist group.

Prosecutors said al-Arian and other members of the organisation used the University of South Florida to give them cover as teachers and students and held meetings under the guise of academic conferences.

Prosecutor Cherie Krigsman likened Islamic Jihad to the Mafia and named al-Arian as one of its “crime bosses”.

Free speech

The defendants said that although they were vocal advocates in the United States for the Palestinian cause and may have celebrated news of the group’s attacks, the government had no proof that they planned or knew about any violence.

They said the money they raised and sent was for legitimate charities.

Al-Arian’s attorney, William Moffit, said the professor was being persecuted for espousing unpopular opinions that should be protected under the First Amendment right to free speech.

“Any discussion of Sami al-Arian being the most powerful man in the [Islamic Jihad] is fantasy,” Moffitt said in his closing argument.

Five others indicted in the case, including al-Arian’s brother-in-law, have not been arrested. The brother-in-law was deported in 2002, and the others also are out of the country.