The shadowy group arose from the ranks of Arab volunteers who flocked to Afghanistan to fight the Soviet invaders in the early 1980s.
Afghanistan had become a hot front in the Cold war contest between the Soviet Union, which had sent troops at the end of the 1970s to defend a friendly Marxist dictatorship, and the United States, which backed increasingly religious-minded rebels.
Among those flocking to support the rebel Afghans was wealthy Saudi business owner Usama bin Ladin. He formed a group of Islamist fighters, or mujahidin, dedicated to the overthrow of what they saw as a Godless regime.
The US and Saudi governments were keen to ensure the mujahidin succeeded. Some analysts believe bin Ladin himself received training, and financial and military support, from the CIA.
This axis of convenience achieved its aim, tying down more than 120,000 troops for a decade before the exhausted and bloodied Soviet army withdrew in 1989.
In the 1990s, the US left war-ravaged Afghanistan and focused on other countries in the Middle East, such as Iraq. Left to their own devices as world attention drifted away, Afghanistan’s mujahidin factions fell to fighting among themselves.
After 1996, the puritanical Taliban faction – backed by Saudi Arabia and Pakistan – became the dominant force in the country.
Mujahidin of the Taliban army –
Bin Ladin’s group – al-Qaida, meaning the Base or Foundation – set its sights on a different enemy. Al-Qaida began targeting the only remaining superpower with troops and dependent governments in the region: its former backer, the United States.
Bin Ladin believes only by breaking Washington’s dominant influence in the Middle East and other parts of the Muslim world, can the West’s puppet regimes be toppled and replaced with legitimate governments.
And only once these corrupt, un-Islamic regimes have been swept away, can Muslims come together to form one strong, independent Islamic bloc, he claims. Among the illegitimate Arab governments targeted for destruction were the Saudi and other Gulf monarchies, Egypt and Saddam Hussein’s Iraq.
The Bush administration was quick to blame the spectacular 11 September 2001 attacks on al-Qaida and identified 19 suspects. But scant evidence has been provided for the allegations and Bin Ladin has never conclusively admitted responsibility although he has praised the attacks.
Once a defined body of battle-hardened fighters and operatives, al-Qaida began to draw in other groups of fighters and dissidents with its radical Islamist ideology of challenging the world order.
Key attacks blamed on al-Qaida
7August 1998: US embassies in Tanzania and Kenya bombed, 231 including 12 Americans die.
12 October 2000: Explosives-laden boat rams USS Cole off Yemen, killing 17 US sailors.
30 December 2000: Bombs in Manila kill 22. Philippines blames Jemaah Islamiyah (JI), a group the US links to al-Qaida.
11 September 2001: Planes hit the World Trade Centre and the Pentagon. Another crashes in Pennsylvania. About 3000 die.
11 April 2002: Truck bomb at historic Tunisian synagogue kills 21, mostly German tourists.
14 June 2002: A truck bomb at the US consulate in Pakistan, kills 14 Pakistanis. Group linked to al-Qaida blamed.
12 October 2002: Nearly 200 mainly western tourists killed in Bali bombings. JI blamed.
28 November 2002: Bombers kill 12 at an Israeli-owned hotel in Kenya. Two missiles miss an airliner carrying Israeli tourists.
12 May 2003: Four explosions rock the Saudi capital. Eight Americans among the 34 killed.
9 November 2003: At least 17 killed in the bombing of a Riyadh compound.
It thus became a network of organisations and cells in different countries with loose links to the hard core around Bin Ladin himself. Some argue it has become more of an idea, around which disparate extreme groups have rallied, than anything else.
Among those with suspected links to al-Qaida are Ansar al-Islam (allegedly present in Iraq and other Middle East states) the GIA (Armed Islamic Group) in Algeria, the Abu Sayyaf rebel group in the Philippines, and the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan.
A faction of the Islamic Jihad group in Egypt is believed to have merged with al-Qaida. Its leader, Ayman al-Zawahiri, has become one of Bin Ladin’s chief lieutenants and allegedly the mastermind behind its biggest operations.
Other key al-Qaida figures include Shaikh Said, Bin Ladin’s brother-in-law and believed to be al-Qaida’s financial controller, and Saif al-Adil, an Egyptian reported to be Bin Ladin’s security chief.
Critics of US policy, however, say the Bush administration and its allies are too quick to declare a link between al-Qaida and any group or government Washington deems an enemy.
They note Bush officials have persuasively linked Saddam Hussein to al-Qaida in the minds of the US public even though most analysts regard the connection as unfounded and unlikely.
Dead or alive
The Taliban provided Bin Ladin’s group with a haven until the US campaign of late 2001 to topple the regime. The US military operation is believed to have disrupted and displaced the core around Bin Ladin, with some followers likely to have found secret refuge in neighbouring countries such as Pakistan.
Bin Ladin warned the US and its
The organisation is now thought to operate in 40 to 50 countries, not only in the Middle East and Asia but in North America and Europe.
Meanwhile, the al-Qaida leader – whom President George Bush declared was “wanted dead or alive” – remains at large despite the deployment of significant ground forces in Afghanistan and sophisticated surveillance technology to track him down.
Over the past year, White House officials have sought to play down the importance of his capture, while some commentators have periodically claimed that Bin Ladin has been killed. He is known to suffer from kidney problems and reportedly requires dialysis treatment.
But taped messages with topical references – the most recent in October – suggest the al-Qaida chief is alive though his exact whereabouts remain a mystery.