Corporations don't need a tax cut, so why is Obama proposing one?

US companies are making big profits and paying few taxes, but presidential candidates want to lower tax rates further.

    President Obama has suggested lowering tax rates for manufacturers in the United States [GALLO/GETTY]
    President Obama has suggested lowering tax rates for manufacturers in the United States [GALLO/GETTY]

    Berkeley, CA - The Obama administration is proposing to lower corporate taxes from the current 35 per cent to 28 per cent for most companies and to 25 per cent for manufacturers.

    The move is supposed to be "revenue neutral" - meaning the administration is also proposing to close assorted corporate tax loopholes to offset the lost revenues. One such loophole allows corporations to park their earnings overseas where taxes are lower.

    "Corporate tax receipts as a share of profits is now at its lowest level in at least 40 years."

    Why isn't the White House just proposing to close the loopholes without reducing overall corporate tax rates? That would generate more tax revenue that could be used for, say, public schools.

    It's not as if corporations are hurting. Quite the contrary. US companies are booking higher profits than ever. They're sitting on $2tn of cash they don't know what to do with.

    And it's not as if corporate taxes are high. In fact, corporate tax receipts as a share of profits is now at its lowest level in at least 40 years. According to the Congressional Budget Office, corporate federal taxes paid last year dropped to 12.1 per cent of profits earned from activities within the United States. That's a gigantic drop from the 25.6 per cent, on average, that corporations paid from 1987 to 2008.

    And it's not that corporations are paying an inordinate share of federal tax revenues. Here again, the reality is just the opposite. Corporate taxes have plummeted as a share of total federal revenues. In 1953, under President Dwight Eisenhower, a Republican, corporate taxes accounted for 32 per cent of total federal tax revenues. Now they're only ten per cent.

    But now the federal budget deficit is ballooning, and in less than a year major cuts are scheduled to slice everything from prenatal care to Medicare. So this would seem to be the ideal time to raise corporate taxes - or at the very least close corporate tax loopholes without lowering corporate rates.

    "House Republicans have already made it clear that, to them, closing a tax loophole is tantamount to raising taxes."

    The average US citizen is not exactly enamoured with the country's corporations. Polls show most of the public doesn't trust them. (A recent national poll by the University of Massachusetts at Lowell found 71 per cent with an unfavourable impression of big business - about the same as those expressing an unfavourable view of Washington.)

    The administration's initiative doesn't even make sense as a bargaining manoeuvre.

    Republicans will just accept the administration's lower corporate tax rate without closing any tax loopholes. House Republicans have already made it clear that, to them, closing a tax loophole is tantamount to raising taxes. And corporate lobbyists in Washington know better than anyone how to hold tight to loopholes they've already got.

    Big business will fight to keep their foreign tax shelters. After all, it's almost impossible to distinguish between their foreign and domestic earnings, which is why the US Chamber of Commerce and other business lobbies have spent the past three years trying to make it even easier for companies to defer US taxes on income they supposedly earn outside the country.

    Representative David Camp, a Michigan Republican who heads the House Ways and Means Committee, has already proposed a 25 per cent corporate top rate and changes that would let companies avoid paying US taxes on even more of the income they say they earn outside the United States.

    Nothing is going to be enacted this year, anyway, so it would have made more sense for the administration to support a hike in corporate taxes - and use it to highlight the difference between the president and his likely Republican challenger.

    Mitt Romney wants to reduce the corporate tax rate to 25 per cent before eliminating any tax loopholes. Rick Santorum wants to cut the rate to 17.5 per cent and eliminate corporate taxes for manufacturers. Newt Gingrich wants to cut the rate to 12.5 per cent and let companies write off all capital investments immediately.

    It's discouraging. The president gives a rousing speech, as he did on December 6 in Kansas. Then he misses an opportunity to put his campaign where his mouth is.

    Robert Reich is Chancellor's Professor of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley. He has served in three national administrations, most recently as secretary of labour under President Bill Clinton. He has written thirteen books, including The Work of Nations, Locked in the Cabinet, Supercapitalism, and his most recent, Aftershock. His "Marketplace" commentaries can be found on and iTunes. He is also Common Cause's board chairman.

    A version of this article was earlier published at 

    SOURCE: Al Jazeera



    Life after death row: The pastor praying for Nigeria's prisoners

    The Nigerian pastor adapting to life after death row

    Clinton Kanu spent 27 years in prison for a murder he did not commit, but life on the outside feels far from free.

    What it means to love a dead child

    What it means to love a dead child

    You must forget all you thought you knew about grief when the landscape of your life has been demolished.

    'Butchered': The Kenyan FGM clinic serving Europeans

    'Butchered': The Kenyan FGM clinic serving Europeans

    Kenya banned FGM in 2011, but Europeans still bring their daughters to underground clinics there to be cut.