Will inequality finally top the agenda at Davos?

The problem of inequality has finally been thrust into the spotlight as the global elite convene in Switzerland.

     Political instability is closely linked to inequality, according to a 2011 UNICEF report [REUTERS]

    Davos, Switzerland - As the global elite gathers for the World Economic Forum this week, the "Occupy" igloos popping up around Davos, Switzerland should serve as a great visual reminder: Inequality can no longer be ignored.

    For the last several years I ticked the box "Inequality" in the pre-Davos survey checking out what participants are most concerned about - while fervently wishing (though doubting) it would then appear as a major trend in the summarised results. Before and after the crash of 2008, other issues topped the agenda, but last year for the first time a majority of invitees shared disquiet about the rising levels of inequality in the world. Of course this might be because the captains of industry and world leaders attending were probably not the ones dutifully filling out surveys, but still…

    Last year was also the first year that an issue more squarely in the sights of global development organisations - cutting maternal and child mortality rates - finally made it to the main stage (the norm being that health, education and poverty discussions go on in the margins). 

    It was great to see government and business leaders pounding fists over real life and death issues that affect millions of too-often unheard women and children at the bottom of economic scale. This helped set the agenda for the win later in the year, when funding pledges for the (at the time ailing) Global Alliance on Vaccines and Immunisation actually exceeded the target. And that primed the pump for a much needed push towards universal coverage to guard against killer diseases such as measles, even in the poorest communities.

    At the same time, it was disappointing how poorly the world's elite grasped the significance of what was then unfolding in Tunisia. I recall the words of an Iranian-American young woman I met who promised that this was the kick-off and that momentum was building right across the Arab world - but no-one was listening to her then. 

    Given the tumultuous year that followed, it's no surprise that the theme for this year's forum, "The great transformation - shaping new models", virtually admits that last year's challenge to agree on "Shared norms for the new reality" was pretty much overtaken by events.

    In the run-up to this year's conference, the issue of inequality has gone mainstream in a big way - at least it seems that way in London, where the media, the politicians and even some brave bankers are vying to respond to the sense of injustice and inequality permeating the economic gloom. 

    But will this translate in the global arena? Despite the Occupy movement, the discourse was quite different in the United States when I visited last month, and I notice many more US companies signed up for Davos this year for some reason. Brazil, Russia, India and China - those large emerging economies known as the BRICs - will see it differently too.

    But the truth is, inequality is a major problem in all these countries. And as UNICEF's 2011 report on global inequality demonstrated, "inequality is also strongly associated with political instability".

    However, even if the argument to address inequality is well-made at Davos, many will argue that the priority has to be on growth and that development assistance can't be afforded in a downturn, or that increased domestic investment in social sectors needs to wait for growth. I'll be arguing for health and education investments in the next generation not just as a moral obligation or political necessity but because it's smart economics. 

    The evidence is there - between 30-50 per cent of Asia's growth between 1965 and 1990 has been attributed to improvements in reproductive health, and reductions in child mortality and fertility rates, and malaria alone is estimated to cost Africa $12b a year in lost revenue.

    It's one thing when Save the Children makes this argument, but fortunately an increasing number of business leaders are getting behind the message. They are responding to what their employees and customers are looking for, a more holistic interpretation of their mission and a more intuitive sense that building a fairer world has got to be good for business. 

    Jasmine Whitbread is the CEO of Save the Children International.

    Follow her on Twitter: @JasmineatSC 

    The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera's editorial policy.

    SOURCE: Al Jazeera



    Visualising every Saudi coalition air raid on Yemen

    Visualising every Saudi coalition air raid on Yemen

    Since March 2015, Saudi Arabia and a coalition of Arab states have launched more than 19,278 air raids across Yemen.

    Lost childhoods: Nigeria's fear of 'witchcraft' ruins young lives

    Lost childhoods: Nigeria's fear of 'witchcraft' ruins young lives

    Many Pentecostal churches in the Niger Delta offer to deliver people from witchcraft and possession - albeit for a fee.

    Why did Bush go to war in Iraq?

    Why did Bush go to war in Iraq?

    No, it wasn't because of WMDs, democracy or Iraqi oil. The real reason is much more sinister than that.