Making the case for 'whale rights'

As the IWC discusses lifting a whaling ban, some say whales should be given legal rights.


    The International Whaling Commission (IWC) has convened in Morocco for a five-day meeting that is expected to lift a 24-year-old ban on whaling.

    The ban was imposed after many species were hunted nearly to extinction.

    The move to resume legal whale hunts comes as scientists and conservationists say new evidence shows whale intelligence is in many ways as sophisticated as that of humans.

    Whale rights

    Whale statistics

     There are about 1.5m whales worldwide

     Pollution, climate change, fishing and ships' sonar signals threaten their survival

      Whaling is the biggest threat

     Despite a 1986 ban 30,000 whales have been killed by Japan, Norway and Iceland under their home-grown quota system

     The Japanese fish at least 1,000 threatened Minke whales a year

     Hundreds of endangered Sei whales are killed ever year

     Japan and Iceland together catch over 50 endangered fin whales annually 

     The notion posed by scientists that whales are intelligent and sentient beings is not on the meeting's agenda

    For decades, opponents of whale hunting have used several arguments to push for a total ban on killing the creatures - saying that they are too rare and endangered, or simply too beautiful.

    Now scientists and ethicists are advancing a new argument: Whales, they say, should be accorded legal rights, just like people.

    Tom White is a professor of ethics at Loyola Marymount University in Los Angeles and a long-time advocate for whale and dolphin preservation.

    "The most important right that would be involved is the right not to be killed, and the right not to be owned as a piece of property," he says.

    When humans consider whales and dolphins, he says, they must realise that "there is a who there, not a what. This isn't an object, this is a being; this is a person, not property".

    Scientific research steadily accumulated over the past 30 years shows that whales are self-aware, can solve complex problems, communicate with each other on a sophisticated level, and even show grief at the loss of offspring or a close companion.

    Whales, many scientists say, have a culture all of their own.

    Richard Ellis is a whale expert from the American Museum of Natural History in New York. He says: "There is no question that cetaceans - that is, whales and dolphins - certainly have the highest level of intelligence of any mammals on earth, probably higher than human beings, although [it is] very, very difficult to measure it."

    In May, an international gathering of scientists in Helsinki, Finland, issued a declaration calling for non-human rights for cetaceans.

    'Ethically untenable'

    Japan, Norway and Iceland are the only remaining countries that hunt whales commercially and the IWC is now expected to approve limited numbers of whale kills over the next ten years.

    But countries including Brazil, New Zealand and the UK say they will fight the plan to lift the 24-year-old ban.

    When it was introduced, the ban was championed by Ronald Reagan, the then US president. But now, conservationists are outraged at Barack Obama, the current US president, for breaking his campaign promise to end whale hunting.

    Instead, the Obama administration is leading the effort to lift the ban, allowing countries once more to legally slaughter whales.

    "What I find especially disappointing," White says, "is that he is not looking at the most important scientific data. His position is ethically untenable in the face of the scientific data."

    The US administration says the deal will actually spare thousands of whales by preventing the three whale hunting countries from cheating on quotas and exploiting legal loopholes. Japan kills thousands of whales each year in the name of so-called scientific research.

    But conservationists do not buy that argument. They say enough is now known about the creatures to make whale killing as morally abhorrent as murder.

    Ellis says: "It's as if a spaceship came down to earth and some strange looking creatures popped out, and we took a look and said those are really weird creatures, we can't communicate with them, I know, let's kill them and eat them. And that's what we've done."

    SOURCE: Al Jazeera


    How different voting systems work around the world

    How different voting systems work around the world

    Nearly two billion voters in 52 countries around the world will head to the polls this year to elect their leaders.

    How Moscow lost Riyadh in 1938

    How Moscow lost Riyadh in 1938

    Russian-Saudi relations could be very different today, if Stalin hadn't killed the Soviet ambassador to Saudi Arabia.

    The great plunder: Nepal's stolen treasures

    The great plunder: Nepal's stolen treasures

    How the art world's hunger for ancient artefacts is destroying a centuries-old culture. A journey across the Himalayas.