Pyongyang lauds ‘perfect success’ of its sixth nuclear test with a hydrogen bomb as tensions with US and allies soar.
Since Kim Jong-un’s ascendancy in December 2011, North Korea has accelerated its missile development programme, the tempo of tests increasing considerably from those under his father Kim Jong Il. After failures in 2016, North Korea has this year made bold advances in its missile programme.
The country conducted its sixth nuclear test on September 3, 2017, setting off a magnitude 6.3 earthquake with a depth of 23 kilometres near its Punggye-ri nuclear test site. North Korean officials claimed the hydrogen bomb tested is more advanced with an estimated yield of up to 100 kilotonnes – roughly four to five times stronger than the bomb dropped on Japan’s Nagasaki – which can be loaded onto an intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM).
This follows a month of escalating tension over the country’s weapons development programme with new UN sanctions, more missile tests, threats of nuclear attack exchanged by Kim Jong-un and Donald Trump, and international calls for de-escalation and to “dial down rhetoric and dial up diplomacy”.
The series of events follow North Korean displays of improvements in missile delivery technology. Just a month prior, on July 28, North Korea launched its first long-range intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM), claiming it demonstrated the capability of the missiles to reach the US mainland. This test came just weeks after Pyongyang tested its first ICBM.
Here are three of North Korea’s recent technical milestones in long-range missile technology which stand out and why they matter.
There are significant challenges to testing a long-range missile in a country that is too small to run test flights within its own border. Initially, North Korea’s only option was to launch these flights over its neighbours. It did that in 1998 by test-firing the Taepodong-1 missile over mainland Japan, to instant international condemnation.
Now, North Korea has started launching longer-range missiles in what is known as a “lofted trajectory”, firing the missile almost vertically. This allows the missile to land a short horizontal distance from launch but travel a great distance overall. Higher altitudes are a strong indication of new, more powerful engines and a greater ability to carry a payload that distance.
These launches enable Pyongyang to conduct realistic tests of longer-range missiles. They also allow engineers to gather data sent back from the test missile to better understand the challenges faced when a long-range warhead re-enters the Earth’s atmosphere at hypersonic speeds, something that generates vast amounts of frictional heat.
This is exactly what North Korea did when it tested the Hwasong-14 (Mars-14) on July 4.
According to the US military’s Pacific Command, or PACOM, which monitors these launches, it flew for 37 minutes, rising to a maximum altitude (known as an apogee) of nearly 2,800km, over seven times higher than the International Space Station which is in orbit only some 400km above the Earth.
A steep, near-vertical launch allowed the missile to travel a distance that roughly simulated long-range flight by travelling higher than most missiles but splashing down only a short distance away into the Sea of Japan, limiting the diplomatic damage that would inevitably be caused by a random projectile flying through a neighbour’s airspace.
The ICBM, a clunky Cold War-era name for a long-range missile, is formally defined as one that can fly more than 5,500km.
According to David Wright of the Union of Concerned Scientists, if the Hwasong-14 was fired under proper flight conditions, it could reach a target more than 6,700km away. This puts the missile firmly in the long-range or ICBM bracket, and means it could potentially hit the US base on the island of Guam as well as Alaska, although the naval base on Hawaii and the rest of the continental US are still out of reach.
First tested by the North just over a decade, ago solid-fuelled missiles are faster to set up and easier to fire.
Unlike liquid fuels, which take time to load and are extremely toxic and corrosive to handle, solid fuels are easier to maintain and are more stable. A crude analogy between the two is to liken solid-fuelled missiles to setting off gunpowder-filled fireworks rather than filling each one with liquid fuel every time you wanted to fire one. Solid fuel reduces launch times from hours to minutes.
Reducing the time from when a missile battery is taken out into the open to be readied for a launch, and therefore is exposed to enemy observation, makes it far less likely to be discovered and destroyed. Using solid fuels also scales back on the additional vehicles needed to transport volatile and dangerous liquid fuels, making a missile battery smaller and harder to spot. As this fuel is more stable, it can also take a few knocks when moved around.
Fortifying a missile battery so it can travel anywhere on land rather than along North Korea’s tiny road system – the country has 724km of paved and 24,830km of unpaved roads respectively – gives it more places to hide.
North Korea has done this by ruggedising the missile transporter (formally called a transporter erector launcher or TEL). Tracks are used instead of wheels, allowing the heavy vehicles to cross rough ground off the road system, which would be monitored by an enemy trying to track down missile batteries. The thin-skinned missile is also sheathed in a canister so it survives bumpy off-road travel.
These improvements came together in the successful February launch of the Pukguksong-2 (Polaris-2) medium-range missile. Analysts across the world quickly realised the test’s importance as the combination of solid fuel, a ruggedised transporter and a protected weapon, meant a battery could potentially hide in forests, underneath cliff overhangs, under bridges – virtually anywhere – and launch within minutes from a cold start.
Producing next-generation missiles that can reach the US will be key for North Korea.
This will not be an easy feat given the trickier aspects of long-range flight. Designs must be able to withstand the stresses and incredible heat produced in missiles by re-entering the atmosphere.
The challenges will come from improving the warhead and delivery system and coupling the two. North Korean scientists will struggle to extend the missiles’ ranges while shrinking their still rudimentary nuclear devices so theý are light enough to be carried by the missile to the target.
Then there is the quest for accuracy, if the missiles are to have any military use.
North Korea has bragged that its latest batch of missile tests were extremely accurate. It is still vague how this accuracy is being assessed given that North Korea does not have a network of satellites able to guide distant warheads to their targets, relying on the projectiles’ much less accurate inertial guidance system.
This electronic system is used in older missiles such as the Scud. It works on the principle of the missile using internally measured basic data on its speed, direction, and so on, to try to roughly assess where it ended up rather than being told where it was exactly by, say, the Global Positioning System (GPS).
If the sharp tempo of tests doesn’t abate, North Korea is likely to see substantial improvements in its missile programme. Kim Jong-un seems determined to “frequently send big and small ‘gift packages’ to the Yankees”, as he instructed scientists after the July 4 test of the first ICBM, according to the country’s state media KCNA.