Novartis patent challenge dismissed

Indian court upholds law that denies patents for minor improvements to known drugs.

    Several Indian drug companies already make generic copies of Gleevec at a tenth of Novartis's price

    The Swiss firm claims India's laws are unfair because they allow Indian companies to manufacture far cheaper imitations of its products.
     
    Critics of Novartis say changes to the law would affect the supply of affordable anti-Aids drugs from India, one of the biggest makers of generic drugs.

     

    Non-governmental organisations feared a victory for Novartis would set a precedent for other pharmaceutical companies seeking patent protection for essential medicines.

     

    'New and improved'

     

    "Our case is solely about safeguarding intellectual property, this is not about patient access."

    Novartis statement

    India's patent law, which came into effect on January 1, 2005, allows patents for products that represent new inventions after 1995, the year India joined the World Trade Organisation, or for an updated drug that shows greater efficacy.

     

    The Indian government rejected a Novartis attempt to patent a new version of its popular leukaemia drug Gleevec.

     

    Novartis insists that its improved drug is more easily absorbed by the body.

     

    But Indian drug companies and aid groups say Gleevec, which is known in Europe and India as Glivec, is a new form of an old drug invented before 1995.

     

    Several Indian pharmaceutical companies already make generic copies of Gleevec, but sell it at a tenth of the $2,600 price for a monthly dose charged by the Swiss company.

     

    Criticism

     

    Novartis says it has a record in funding health care projects for the poor which cost it hundreds of millions of dollars.

     

    Activists say a change in drug patent law
    could leave millions without treatment [AFP]

    In a statement in January, the company said: "Our case is solely about safeguarding intellectual property. This is not about patient access. With our well-regarded record in social responsibility, we are surprised that some groups are confusing the issue in India."

     

    But health campaign groups say that if drug companies like Novartis are allowed to patent their products, cheap copies will dry up, and the poor will go untreated.

     

    International aid groups Medecins Sans Frontieres and Oxfam collected more than 250,000 signatures for a petition to Novartis asking it to drop its case.

     

    Campaigners are also looking to the Indian government for help and sympathetic politicians say patent laws simply should not apply to drugs at all.

     

    Novartis has defended its position and said it will offer its leukaemia drug for free to patients who cannot afford it.

    SOURCE: Al Jazeera and agencies


    YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

    How Moscow lost Riyadh in 1938

    How Moscow lost Riyadh in 1938

    Russian-Saudi relations could be very different today, if Stalin hadn't killed the Soviet ambassador to Saudi Arabia.

    Interactive: Coding like a girl

    Interactive: Coding like a girl

    What obstacles do young women in technology have to overcome to achieve their dreams? Play this retro game to find out.

    The War in October: What Happened in 1973?

    The War in October: What Happened in 1973?

    Al Jazeera examines three weeks of war from which both Arabs and Israelis claimed to emerge victorious.