Khalilzad: Success in Iraq still possible

The US ambassador to Iraq has urged Iraqi leaders to work harder to achieve political and security goals, saying a struggle was going on between moderate and extremist forces.

    Khalilzad (R) and General Casey at the press conference

    Zalmay Khalilzad said on Tuesday in a joint media interview with General George Casey from Baghdad that success in Iraq was still possible and could be achieved on a "realistic timetable".

    Khalilzad said Iraqi leaders had agreed to a timeline to reduce violence, and that a "national compact" should be in place in the next 12 months if the Iraqi government lives up to agreements.

    He said the US will succeed in Iraq, but it will take patience and resolve, and the US should redouble efforts to succeed.

    He identified Iran and Syria as backers of extremist forces that are spilling blood and preventing the stabilisation of the country.

    For his part, Casey, the leading US commander in Iraq, said Iran and Syria have been "decidedly unhelpful" over the US's attempts to stabilise Iraq.

    He said Iraqi forces should be able to take full control of security in the next 12 to 18 months with minimal US support.

    Casey said the Iraqi army lost 300 men during the past four weeks alone. Talking about al-Qaeda in Iraq, he said the network was wounded but remains lethal.

    SOURCE: Agencies


    YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

    Learn what India's parties' symbols mean by drawing them

    Learn what India's parties' symbols mean by drawing them

    More than 2,300 political parties have registered for the largest electoral exercise in the world.

    Visualising every Saudi coalition air raid on Yemen

    Visualising every Saudi coalition air raid on Yemen

    Since March 2015, Saudi Arabia and a coalition of Arab states have launched more than 19,278 air raids across Yemen.

    Why did Bush go to war in Iraq?

    Why did Bush go to war in Iraq?

    No, it wasn't because of WMDs, democracy or Iraqi oil. The real reason is much more sinister than that.